Economic evaluation of delivering Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in routine immunization services in Kenya
Angela Oloo Akumu, Mike English, J Anthony G Scott, Ulla K Griffiths
Volume 85, Number 7, July 2007, 511-518
Table 1. Parameters for estimating burden of Hib disease in Kenya before and after vaccine introduction
| Parameter | Base case value | Range used in uncertainty analysis | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 birth cohort | 1 322 000 | – | 24 |
| Pentavalent & DTP+hep B vaccine coverage of 3rd dose | 73% | 70–75% | 24 |
| Meningitis of total invasive Hib disease | 54% | 52–56% | 11 |
| Non-meningitic invasive disease of total invasive Hib disease | 46% | – | 11 |
| Hib pneumonia:Hib meningitis cases | 5:1 | SD 0.5 | 5–7 |
| Before Hib vaccine introduction | 66 | 49.6–81.6 | 11 |
| After Hib vaccine introduction | 7.60 | 1.6–22.3 | 11 |
| Hospital care | 50% | 30–70% | 12,13 |
| Outpatient care | 25% | 15–35% | 12,13 |
| No access to formal care | 25% | 15–35% | 12,13 |
| Hib meningitis + hospital treatment | 17% | 7–44% | 16,25 |
| Hib meningitis & non-meningitis invasive Hib disease + outpatient treatment | 63% | 40–90% | 26 |
| Hib meningitis & Hib non-meningitis invasive disease + no biomedical treatment | 97% | 80–100% | Assumption |
| Non-meningitis invasive Hib disease + hospital treatment | 26% | 7–44% | 9 |
| Non-bacteraemic Hib pneumonia + hospital treatment | 3.5% | 2.5–4.5% | Assumption |
| Non-bacteraemic Hib pneumonia + outpatient treatment only | 7% | 2.5–10% | Assumption |
| Non-bacteraemic Hib pneumonia + no biomedical treatment | 25% | 15–35% | 27 |
DTP, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis; hep B, hepatitis B; Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; SD, standard deviation.
