Prevalence of female genital cutting among Egyptian girls
Mohammed A Tag-Eldin a, Mohsen A Gadallah a, Mahmoud N Al-Tayeb a, Mostafa Abdel-Aty b, Esmat Mansour c, Mona Sallem a
Female genital cutting (FGC) is the collective name given to traditional practices that involve partial or total cutting away of the female external genitalia whether for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons.1 It is estimated that between 100 and 130 million girls and women now alive in at least 28 African countries and the Middle East have been subjected to FGC.2
FGC represents a fundamental violation of women’s and girls’ rights. Eighteen African countries have prevalence rates of 50% or higher. FGC has traditionally been called female circumcision. Recognition of its harmful physical, psychological and human rights consequences has led to the use of the term “female genital mutilation” or FGM. Many women who have undergone FGC do not consider themselves to be mutilated and have become offended by the term “FGM”. Recently, other terms such as “female genital cutting” have increasingly been used.
Practices involving cutting of female genitals have been found throughout history in many cultures, but there is no definitive evidence documenting when or why this ritual began. Some theories suggest that FGC might have been practised in ancient Egypt as a sign of distinction, while others hypothesize its origin in ancient Greece, Rome, Pre-Islamic Arabia and the Tsarist Russian Federation.
In Egypt, the Demographic Health Survey in 2000 revealed that 97% of married women surveyed experienced FGC.3 Another study, carried out by the Egyptian Ministry of Health and Population in 2003, reported that 94.6% of married women had been exposed to FGC and 69.1% of those women agreed to carry out FGC on their daughters. A pilot study by the Health Insurance Organization showed that 41% of female students in primary, preparatory and secondary schools had been exposed to FGC.
The majority of existing research into FGC concentrated on women of reproductive age. Girls exposed to FGC had not been studied before on a national level. Thus, the Ministry of Health and Population realized the importance of conducting this prevalence study.
Our objectives were to measure the prevalence of FGC among schoolgirls in Egypt, identify who performs FGC, and document the rate of reported complications.
Places of study
Multistage random technique was applied for site selection as follows:
Egypt was divided into five geographical areas, from which nine governorates were randomly selected (Table 1): Table 1 The prevalence of FGC among female students in selected governorates in Egypt Governorates Total no. of females interviewed Females with FGC No. Percentage Cairo 7 696 2 811 36.5 Alexandria 4 597 1 800 39.2 Sharkia 4 487 3 314 73.9 Dakahlyia 4 240 2 111 49.8 Demiatta 3 415 735 21.5 Port Said 1 989 356 17.9 Bani Suif 4 135 3 024 73.1 Assuit 4 508 3 389 75.5 Luxor city 1 761 1 506 85.5 North Sinai 1 988 503 25.3 Total 38 816 19 543 50.3 FGC, female genital cutting. Greater Cairo (Cairo) Lower Egypt (Sharkia, Demiatta, Dakahlyia and Alexandria) Upper Egypt (Bani Suif, Assuit and Luxor city) Sinai (North Sinai) Suez Canal Region (Port Said)Although it is a small city, Luxor is considered as a governorate due to its cultural and historic importance. It has only one health district which was included in our study.
From each governorate, two educational districts were selected randomly. In each of the selected districts, the schools were divided into primary, preparatory and secondary schools. In each education stage, the schools were divided into rural, urban, government and private (Table 2).
Representative schools were selected randomly.
The assumption in calculating the sample size in each governorate depends on a decrease by 5% in the current prevalence of FGC. Using a level of significance at 0.05 and the power of the test of 80%, the sample size (with the calculated sample size in parentheses) in each selected governorate and Luxor city was as follows:Cairo = 7696 (6900)Alexandria = 4597 (4200)Sharkia = 4487 (4200)Dakahlyia = 4240 (4200)Demiatta = 3415 (4200)Port Said = 1989 (2200)Bani Suif = 4135 (4000)Assuit = 4508 (4200)Luxor city = 1761 (1600)North Sinai = 1988 (1800)The total sample size was 38 816 girls.Time of field study was from March to May 2005.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in all selected governorates. An interview questionnaire with 20 questions about FGC was developed and tested before its use. The questionnaire included data pertaining to age, place of residence in the last 5–10 years, educational level of girl, her mother and father, age at time of FGC, reasons given to support and reject the practice, who performed the FGC, consequences of FGC, and the decision-maker. Interviews of the female students were conducted by female physicians working in the school sector of the National Health Insurance Organization.
Data entry and coding was performed using Microsoft Excel 2000. First, simple frequency, mean, standard deviation and range were calculated. Thereafter, comparisons were made using Pearson’s χ² test for categorical variables. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 11.0 (SPSS Inc. Headquarters, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America). Level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
The total number of females interviewed was 38 816. The prevalence of FGC among schoolgirls was 50.3%. The prevalence of FGC was 46.2% in government urban schools, 9.2% in private urban schools and 61.7% in rural schools. Educational levels of mother and father were negatively associated with FGC (P < 0.001). The mean age of the time of FGC was 10.1 ± 2.3 years.
FGC has remained a common practice in the countries where it has traditionally been performed.4 The most common forms of FGC still widely practised throughout Egypt are type I (commonly referred to as clitoridectomy) and type II (commonly referred to as excision).5 In Africa, the most common type of FGC is type II (excision of the clitoris and the labia minor) which accounts for up to 80% of all cases.6 It is of note that there is no doctrinal basis for this practice in either the Islamic or Christian faiths.
In recent years, the laws regarding FGC have changed. In 1995, a ministerial decree forbade the practice and made it punishable by fine and imprisonment. A series of later ministerial decrees allowed certain forms but prohibited others. Doctors were prohibited from performing the procedure in government health facilities and non-medical practitioners were forbidden from practising any form. In 1996, a ministerial decree prohibited all medical and non-medical practitioners from performing FGC in either public or private facilities, except for medical reasons certificated by the head of a hospital’s obstetric and gynaecology department. Perpetrators can lose their medical license and be subjected to criminal punishment.7
Most of the girls and women who have undergone FGC live in 28 African countries, although some live in Asia and the Middle East. They are also present in Australia, Canada, Europe and the USA, primarily among immigrants from these countries. Due to international migration, FGC has become an issue of increasing concern in host countries.4,8 The prevalence of FGC is quite high in most African countries. In Nigeria, the prevalence of FGC in 2004 ranged between 23.3% and 45.2%. The highest rates of more than 90% were found in Djibouti, Eritrea, Mali and Somalia.9–11
In our study, the overall prevalence rate of FGC was 50.3% among girls in the age group 10–18 years. In rural schools, the prevalence rate was 61.7% compared to 46.2% in urban schools. Of note, in private urban schools the prevalence rate was very low (9.2%). The difference in the prevalence rates of FGC is mainly due to educational status in both rural and urban areas.
There were marked differences in the prevalence of FGC between the governorates. In Upper Egypt governorates, the prevalence was high in Luxor city (85.5%) while in Assuit and Bani Suif rates were 75.5% and 73.1% respectively. In Lower Egypt governorates, the prevalence rates of FGC were 49.8% and 73.9% in Dakahlyia and Sharkia. The lowest rates of FGC were seen in Port Said, Demiatta and North Sinai with prevalence rates of 17.9%, 21.5% and 25.3% respectively. It is clear that FGC is widely practised in the southern parts of Egypt. It was also observed from this study that in the rural areas of Luxor, almost all females were circumcised (99.3%). This shows that the practice of FGC still persists in Upper Egypt even among highly educated families in urban areas. Religious reasons, traditions and social pressure are the main motives for performing FGC. These results are similar to those obtained from a community-based study in a Sudanese village in 2001.12
There is an obvious negative correlation between the female’s parents’ education and the practice of FGC. This observation was clearly noticed in all governorates studied. Parents with low or no education are the most likely to have circumcised their daughters with prevalence rates ranging between 59.5% and 65.1%, while parents with higher degrees of education are the least likely to have their daughters circumcised and the prevalence rate ranged between 19.5% and 22.2%. Similar results were obtained from the Egyptian Demographic and Health survey in 2003.13
The age at which FGC is performed on girls varies between countries and even from area to area within the same country. FGC is typically performed on young girls who are between 4 and 12 years old, however, the procedure may be carried out shortly after birth to some time before the age of marriage.6
In the current study, the average age at which the procedure of FGC was performed was 10.1 ± 2.3 years (Table 3). In some rural areas of Luxor city, some girls mentioned that they were circumcised soon after birth, during the neonatal period.
According to a WHO report on female genital mutilation, some communities in Africa perform FGC on infants a few days old. Generally, the average age of performing FGC is lower in other African countries than in Egypt. In Nigeria, the average age at which FGC was performed was 6.9 ± 2.9 years, with 4% of women having the procedure performed in pregnancy.14,15 According to the Demographic and Health Survey in Benin (2001), over one third of girls were cut before reaching their fourth birthday.2 In some areas in Benin, girls are cut relatively late but before the age of 11.
In Africa, FGC is usually carried out by traditional practitioners or lay persons. In Egypt, in the past, the majority of FGC procedures were performed by traditional midwives, called dayas. However, according to the Demographic and Health Survey (1995),16 the number of procedures performed by medical practitioners (doctors, nurses or trained midwives) tripled to 55% with a concomitant drop in the use of dayas. In the present study, physicians in their clinics performed 49.7% of FGC and at their hospitals 7.6%, while nurses performed only 10.4%. Dayas and midwives performed 29.3% of FGC while lay persons performed only 3%.
In Nigeria, medical doctors were the most mentioned operators (34.5%) followed by traditional birth attendants (33.8%). In contrast to Nigeria, in Benin, the Demographic and Health Survey data found that over 90% of daughters’ circumcision were performed by traditional practitioners and only 0.5% of girls had the operation under medical care. In developed countries, immigrants asked doctors originally from their own community to circumcise their girls illegally. More frequently, traditional practitioners are brought into the country or girls are sent abroad to be circumcised.15
The potential physical complications resulting from the procedure are numerous. An immediate effect of the procedure is pain because FGC is often carried out without anaesthesia. Short-term complications, such as severe bleeding which can lead to shock or death, are greatly affected by the type of FGC performed, the degree of struggle by the girl and the experience of practitioners or medical services once bleeding occurs. Other complications include infection because of unsanitary operating conditions, and significant psychological and psychosexual consequences of FGC. Our results revealed that 21.8% of girls said that there was mild pain after they were circumcised and 1.5% of girls reported that they suffered severe bleeding.
Recently, many articles have reported post-FGC complications (early and late) such as severe pain, bleeding, incontinence, infections, mental health problems, sexual problems, primary infertility and difficult labour with high episiotomy rate. In addition, the repetitive use of the same instruments on several girls without sterilization can cause the spread of HIV and Hepatitis B and C. In previous studies, the rate of complication ranged between 13% and 69%.4,17–19
The results of the present study (Table 4) showed that mothers are the main decision-makers for the procedure of FGC (65.2%). Fathers played minor roles as decision-makers for the procedure (9.4%) while the family as a whole represented 24.2% of the decision-makers. This result should direct our strategy to concentrate on changing the attitude of mothers and grandmothers towards the prevention of this violence against girls.
The circumcised girls in this study were asked for reasons to support the practice of FGC and they answered that circumcision is an important religious tradition (33.4%), cleanliness for girls (18.9%), cultural and social tradition (17.9%) and chastity (15.9%). Of note, religious tradition is still the most important reason for performing FGC in Egypt, which agrees with the results obtained from Demographic and Health Surveys in Egypt in 2000 and 2003. In these surveys, 72% of ever-married women reported that circumcision is an important part of religious tradition and about two-thirds of the women had the impression that the husband prefers his wife to be circumcised. According to the Demographic and Health Survey in Egypt in 1995, more than one-third of ever-married women cited cleanliness as a reason while a small number saw it as a way to prevent promiscuity before marriage. In some communities, some families refuse to accept women who have not undergone FGC as marriage partners. Other studies in Africa concluded that the most significant factors associated with the acceptance of FGC were religion, tradition and social pressure, as reported in Egypt and Sudan,12,20 while ethnicity was the most significant social predictor of FGC in Nigeria.21 Both ethnicity and religion were the strongest predictors of FGC in the United Republic of Tanzania.11 Also, and of note, sexuality was an important reason cited for this practice in some countries like Nigeria.22
In the present study, 53.9% of non-circumcised girls, said circumcision is not important, and that it is an unhealthy and painful procedure, while 17.5% of girls said that it is unnecessary for females. Around 12% of girls believed that there is no religious support for circumcision.
In 2003, the Egyptian Interim Demographic and Health Survey obtained information from women who said that their daughters would not be circumcised. The majority of these women (61%) simply said that they did not believe in the practice of FGC. Meanwhile, a substantial proportion of them expressed concern about potential health complications (42%) and only 20% saw FGC practice as against their religion. Other reasons included better marriage prospects (8%) and better sexual relations with their husband (5%). Another study in Egypt among medical students reported that 72–78% of medical students were against FGC.20,23
FGC has raised a lot of concerns among women’s groups especially in African, international and professional organizations. Currently, many African governments recognize that FGC is a violation of the human rights of girls and women.
Any action against FGC should take into account the multiplicity of reasons that support and motivate its practice. It is an issue that demands a collaborative approach involving health professionals, religious leaders, educationalists and nongovernmental organizations. Governments should take an active role in supporting regional and international initiatives to combat FGC, such as WHO, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The role of international solidarity is to complement and support the work carried out locally by providing technical, methodological and financial support. ■
- Toubia N. Caring for women with circumcision. Raimbo, NY; 1999.
- Benin DHS. Geneva: UNICEF; 2001.
- El-Zanaty F, Way AA. Egypt demographic and health survey 2000. Calverton, MD: Ministry of Health and Population, National Population Council, and ORC Macro; 2001.
- Elgaali M, Strevens H, Mardh PA. Female genital mutilation an exported medical hazard. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2005; 10: 93-7 doi: 10.1080/13625180400020945 pmid: 16147813.
- Al-Hussaini TK. Female genital cutting - types, motives and perineal damage in laboring Egyptian women. Med Pinc Pract 2003;Apr-Jun:123-8.
- Female genital mutilation [Fact sheet no. 241]. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
- Egypt: report on female genital mutilation (FGM) or cutting (FGC) [FMC Country Report]. US Department of State; 2001.
- Thierfelder C, Tanner M, Bodiang CM. Female genital mutilation in the context of migration: experience of African women with the Swiss health care system. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 86-90 doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki120 pmid: 15788809.
- Abubakar I, Iliyasu Z, Kabir M, Uzoho CC, Abdulkadir MB. Knowledge, attitude and practice of female genital cutting among antenatal patients in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano. Niger J Med 2004; 13: 254-8 pmid: 15532227.
- Mandara MU. Female genital mutilation in Nigeria. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 291-8 doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.06.001 pmid: 15001386.
- Klouman E, Manogi R, Klepp KI. Self-reported and observed female genital cutting in rural Tanzania associated demographic factors, HIV and sexually transmitted infections. Trop Med Int Health 2005; 10: 105-15 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01350.x pmid: 15655020.
- Almroth L, Almroth-Bergren V, Hassanein OM, El-Hadi N, Al Said SS, Hasaan SS, et al., et al. A community based study on the change of practice of female genital mutilation in a Sudanese village. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 74: 179-85 doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00392-7 pmid: 11502298.
- El-Zanaty F, Wavy AA. Egypt interim demographic and health survey. Ministry of Health and Population, National Population Council, El-Zanaty and Associates, ORC Macro; 2004.
- Dare FO, Oboro VO, Fadiora SO, Orji EO, Sule-Odu AO. Debate to female genital mutilation: an analysis of 522 cases in South-Western Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 24: 281-3 doi: 10.1080/01443610410001660850 pmid: 15203627.
- Female genital mutilation – a human rights information pack. Amnesty International Report; 2004.
- El-Zanaty F, Hussein EM, Shawky GA, Way AA, Kishor S. Egypt demographic and health survey 1995. Calverton, MD: National Population Council and Macro International;1996.
- Almroth L, Elmusharaf S, El Hadi N, Obeid A, El Sheikh MA, Elfadil SM, et al., et al. Primary infertility after genital mutilation in girlhood in Sudan: a case-control study. Lancet 2005; 366: 385-91 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67023-7 pmid: 16054938.
- Behrendt A, Moritz S. Post-traumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1000-2 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.1000 pmid: 15863806.
- Hakim LY. Impact of female genital mutilation on maternal and neonatal outcomes during parturition. East Afr Med J 2001; 78: 255-8 pmid: 12002086.
- Allam MF, de Irala-Estevez J, Fernandez-Crehuet-Navajas R, Serrano del Castillo A, Hoashi JS, Pankovich MB, et al., et al. Factors associated with the condoning of female genital mutilation among university students. Public Health 2001; 115: 350-5 doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(01)00474-7 pmid: 11593445.
- Snow RC, Slanger TE, Okonofua FE, Oronsaya F, Wacker J. Female genital cutting in southern urban and peri-urban Nigeria - Self-reported validity, social determinants and secular trend. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 7: 91-100 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00829.x pmid: 11851959.
- Ugboma HA, Akani CI, Babatunde S. Prevalence and medicalization of female genital mutilation. Niger J Med 2004; 13: 250-3 pmid: 15532226.
- Refaat AH, Dandash KF, Lotfy G, Eyada M. Attitudes of medical students towards female genital mutilation. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27: 589-91 doi: 10.1080/713846814 pmid: 11554222.
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbassia 11566, Cairo, Egypt.
- Health Insurance Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
- Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt.