Global methylmercury exposure from seafood consumption and risk of developmental neurotoxicity: a systematic review
Mary C Sheehan a, Thomas A Burke b, Ana Navas-Acien c, Patrick N Breysse c, John McGready d & Mary A Fox b
a. Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America (USA).
b. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
c. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
d. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Correspondence to Mary C Sheehan (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
(Submitted: 05 December 2012 – Revised version received: 15 October 2013 – Accepted: 12 November 2013 – Published online: 10 January 2014.)
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2014;92:254-269F. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.116152
The World Health Organization (WHO) considers mercury (Hg) among the top 10 chemicals of “major public health concern”.1 Evidence of ubiquitous Hg contamination globally led to the recent Minamata Mercury Convention, a binding international treaty to control anthropogenic Hg emissions.2 A principal form of Hg to which general populations are exposed is methylmercury (MeHg). Transformation of Hg emissions to organic MeHg takes place in the aquatic environment, where MeHg bioaccumulates in food webs. In human beings MeHg exposure occurs predominantly through the consumption of seafood (including freshwater and marine varieties, shellfish and marine mammals).3–6 MeHg is a neurotoxin particularly harmful to the developing fetal brain.3–6 A large body of research has demonstrated an association of exposure in utero with developmental neurotoxicity (e.g. deficits in fine motor skills, language and memory) among populations that consume seafood regularly.3,7–9 Such studies have been used to develop health-based reference doses below which no appreciable risk of harm is thought to occur, including the provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), established by the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additivies (JECFA) of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and WHO.6,10 Recent research suggests harm at doses associated with relatively infrequent seafood consumption.11
Seafood species vary in MeHg content depending on contamination source, trophic level and other factors.12–14 Seafood, on the other hand, is an important source of nutrients, including neuroprotective omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids.15 Research on the benefits and harms of seafood highlights the importance of choosing species low in MeHg and high in these polyunsaturated fatty acids and of ensuring that consumers have sufficient information to make such choices.15,16 Well-designed seafood advisories can be helpful to this end,17,18 but they exist in a small number of countries, most of which are high-income.19 An estimated 400 million women of reproductive age in the world rely on seafood for at least 20% of their intake of animal protein; a large share of them live in low- and middle-income countries where access to information on MeHg content in seafood is not widely available.20–22 Although the research conducted in the last two decades has highlighted the risk in subsistence fishing communities that practise artisanal and small-scale gold mining23 and among Arctic peoples whose diet consists of apex marine predators such as the pilot whale,24 few researchers have compared MeHg exposures globally in women who consume seafood.
Human exposure to chemical contaminants can be characterized by examining biomarkers.25 Total Hg in hair (THHg) and total Hg in blood (TBHg) are both validated biomarkers of MeHg intake correlated with seafood consumption in general human populations.4,26 Our goal was to review and synthesize the evidence from published studies reporting THHg and TBHg biomarkers to systematically compare global MeHg exposure among women and their infants from seafood-consuming populations. By identifying populations at higher risk, we aim to provide policy-makers with scientific evidence for the prioritization of risk reduction messages and targeted population surveillance.
Based on a pre-defined study protocol,27 we performed a systematic electronic search of the peer-reviewed scientific literature (Box 1). Studies were selected in two stages: title and abstract screening, followed by full text review after application of exclusion criteria. We excluded studies not involving women or infants from general populations and not reporting a central THHg or TBHg biomarker estimate. When multiple articles reported on a single sample, we chose the most recent one with complete data. To ensure robust summary statistics, we excluded studies with less than 40 participants.
Box 1. Literature search strategy for global systematic review of methylmercury exposure from seafood in women and infants
1. “fetus” OR “infant” OR “newborn” OR “maternal” OR “mother” OR “pregnant” OR “women”
2. “fish” OR “marine” OR “shellfish” OR “seafood”
3. “mercury” OR “methylmercury” OR “methyl AND mercury” OR “biomonitoring”
Combined terms: 1 AND 2 AND 3.
Note: The following databases were searched for studies published from January 1991 to September 2013: PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, TOXNET and LILACS. References were hand-checked and there were no restrictions on language or study design.
We extracted data on study design, population characteristics, measures of average (geometric mean or median) and high-end (90th or 95th percentile or maximum) biomarkers, exposure conditions and main covariates examined. Extracted biomarkers were organized into three subpopulation groups: non-pregnant women; pregnant women and mothers who had recently given birth; and infants (up to 12 months of age). Because biomarkers for more than one subpopulation with different levels of exposure were often reported in the same study, the subpopulation was our main level of analysis.
We stratified subpopulations into six mutually exclusive categories based on predictors of the body burden of MeHg. The most important of these predictors are seafood consumption frequency and seafood MeHg content. In most seafood species MeHg represents the largest fraction of total Hg (inorganic Hg representing a much smaller share). Thus, seafood MeHg concentration is commonly measured as total Hg in tissue.3,4 Seafood consumption estimates were reported in some studies; data on total Hg concentrations were rarely provided. Research suggests the following general hierarchy: marine mammals, other apex marine predators and some industrially-contaminated fish [containing several parts per million (ppm)]; large marine fish [containing up to 1 or more ppm]; most commercially purchased marine and freshwater fish [often containing less than 0.5 ppm] and most shellfish [often containing less than 0.2 ppm].23,24,28–31 Seafood intake is generally higher in coastal regions than inland30,32 and seafood from globalized commercial sources predominates in many urban areas.14 We therefore generated six categories based on the following proxy predictors, reported in most studies: seafood source; seafood type; likely Hg contamination pathway; and residential context. Four categories included populations consuming seafood that was mainly self-caught and two included populations consuming seafood that was commercially purchased primarily (Table 1).
Table 1. Methylmercury exposure categoriesa for women and infants from seafood-consuming populations
As recommended in guidelines for the systematic review of observational studies,27 we evaluated study quality by examining the risk of bias in three areas: selection of participants (selection methods and reporting of exposure characteristics); exposure measurement (laboratory methods and quality control); and statistical methods and covariate analysis (evaluation of distribution shape, reporting of seafood intake and exposure to non-seafood sources of Hg).
We derived two summary distributions – central and upper bound – for each exposure category by pooling average and high-end biomarkers. For comparability, all TBHg biomarkers were converted to THHg-equivalent at a hair-to-blood ratio of 250:1.3,5 We summarized resulting statistical distributions using medians and percentiles. To interpret results, we compared distribution medians with the THHg-equivalent value of the PTWI dose (approximately 2.2 μg/g) established by the JECFA.10 We also determined the share of subpopulations with average and high-end biomarkers over this reference. In sensitivity analysis we evaluated the impact on pooled biomarkers taking into account differences in participant selection, exposure measurement and statistical methods identified in the quality review. Given substantial heterogeneity in population exposure conditions, study designs and reporting, we did not undertake a meta-analysis. All data analysis was performed in Stata10 (StataCorp, College Station, United States of America).
Of 3042 articles identified in the published literature, we screened 1402 non-duplicates (1379 were identified by electronic search and 23 by hand search); we excluded 1120 and we reviewed the full texts of the remaining 282, from which we excluded 118 (Fig. 1). The remaining 164 articles, which reported total Hg biomarkers for 239 distinct subpopulations, were included in this review. Selected articles report biomarker concentrations for 63 943 women and infants from 43 countries (Table 2). Most (73%) studies were cross-sectional and over half (56%) reported THHg measures; the majority (79%) were published after 2001. Studies published in 1991–2001 were conducted primarily in populations consuming self-caught seafood; since 2001, the number of studies in consumers of seafood that is predominantly commercially purchased has increased notably in both absolute and relative terms (Fig. 2). The characteristics of the selected studies are provided in Table 3 and Table 4 (both available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/04/13-116152).
Fig. 1. Selection of articles for the review of studies on methylmercury exposure in women and infants from seafood-consuming populations
Table 2. Summary of studies assessing total mercury in hair (THHg) or total mercury in blood (TBHg) among women and infants from seafood-consuming populations, by exposure category
Fig. 2. Number of selected studies reporting total mercury in hair (THHg) or total mercury in blood (TBHg) in women and infants from seafood-consuming populations, by predominant seafood type (local self-caught or commercially purchased) and year of publication
Table 3. Characteristics of studies assessing total mercury in hair (THHg) or total mercury in blood (TBHg) in women and infants consuming self-caught seafood, by exposure category and subcategory
Table 4. Characteristics of studies assessing total mercury in hair (THHg) or total mercury in blood (TBHg) in women and infants consuming seafood that is predominantly commercially purchased, by exposure category and subcategory
Pooled biomarker concentrations
For 43 subpopulations of women and infants living near small-scale gold mining sites in Bolivia (Plurinational State of),33,34 Brazil,35–53,59,60 Colombia,54 French Guiana,55–57 Indonesia58 and Surinam61 the pooled central distribution median THHg biomarker concentration was 5.4 µg/g (upper bound median: 23.1) (Table 5). Values were higher (8.2 µg/g; upper bound: 27.5) in the subgroup of rural riverine dwellers reliant on local freshwater fish and lower (1.4 µg/g; upper bound: 11.8) among urban dwellers consuming less fish. For 21 subpopulations from Arctic regions, including in Canada,62–66 Denmark (Greenland and the Faroe Islands),67–69 Norway,70,71 the Russian Federation72 and the United States (state of Alaska),73 the pooled central distribution median result was 2.1 µg/g (upper bound: 9.8); values were higher (3.6 µg/g; upper bound: 24.3) for marine mammal and other self-caught seafood consumers and lower (0.4 µg/g; upper bound: 1.4) among those with a diet including less seafood and less reliant on these traditional foods.
Table 5. Pooled total THHg biomarker distributions in women and infants from seafood-consuming populations, by exposure category and subcategory
For 25 subpopulations whose self-caught fish from local waterways is affected by Hg-emitting industries in Brazil,74,75 Chile,76 China,77–81 Colombia,82 Italy,83,84 Kazakhstan,85 Mexico,87 Morocco,88 Nicaragua,89 Norway,115 the Republic of Korea,86 Romania,90 Slovakia,81,91 Sweden,92 Taiwan, China,93 the United States94 and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of),95 the pooled central THHg median biomarker was 0.8 µg/g (upper bound: 4.6). In 14 subpopulations consuming fish periodically from non-industry-contaminated waters in Botswana,96 Canada,97–102 Norway,103 Sweden104 and the United States,105–107 the value was 0.4 µg/g (upper bound: 2.8).
For 102 coastal or island-dwelling subpopulations consuming seafood that is predominantly commercially purchased, the combined central median THHg concentration was 0.8 µg/g (upper bound: 6.8). On the Atlantic coast, the pooled result for 35 subpopulations in Brazil,108 Canada,99,109 France,110,111 Norway,115 Portugal,117 Spain,118 Sweden,81,92,112–114,119 the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland120,121 and the United States122–131 was 0.4 µg/g (upper bound: 2.9). For 27 subpopulations from the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean (combined because of similar THHg ranges and referred to as “Mediterranean”) in Albania,132 Croatia,133 Greece,133,135 the Islamic Republic of Iran,136–139 Italy,83,133,140 Kuwait,141 Morocco,142 Seychelles,143 South Africa,144,145 Spain146 and Turkey,147 the pooled central THHg concentration was 0.7 µg/g (upper bound: 8.5). For 40 Pacific coast subpopulations in China,148–151 Japan,153–160 Peru,172 the Republic of Korea,161–171 Taiwan, China174 and the United States,175,176 the pooled result was 1.3 µg/g (upper bound: 6.0).
For 34 subpopulations living in inland regions of Austria,177 Brazil,178 Canada,179 Croatia,81 the Czech Republic,81,180,181 France,142,182 Italy,84 Morocco,81 Pakistan,183 Poland,184 the Republic of Korea,169 Saudi Arabia,186–188 Slovenia,81,189 Spain,190,191 Sweden192 and the United States,193–196 the pooled central TTHg median was 0.4 µg/g (upper bound: 2.9).
Comparison with provisional tolerable weekly intake
The median of the pooled central THHg biomarker distribution for women and infants in rural riverine communities near tropical gold mining sites reached nearly four times the FAO/WHO PTWI reference level of 2.2 ug/g (Fig. 3), while the upper-bound median reached more than 10 times this reference. Some individual high-end biomarkers exceeded 50 µg/g, the lower end of the range found in the neurological syndrome known as Minamata disease,4 associated with accidental industrial Hg poisoning in Japan in the 1950s and 1960s (Fig. 4). The median of the central THHg biomarker distribution in Arctic traditional food consumers exceeded the reference by 63%, while the upper bound median was over 10 times the value. For women and infants in the industry and fishing categories, central estimate medians were below the international reference, although the industry central median was twice that of the fishing category; most high-end biomarkers were above it. For those in the Pacific coastal subcategory, the 75th percentile approached the reference value; the upper bound median was nearly three times this value and nearly all high-end biomarkers exceeded it. Central biomarkers were below the PTWI in the Atlantic. However in many subpopulations in the Mediterranean they exceeded this reference, while the upper bound median was nearly four times the reference and most high-end biomarkers exceeded it. For the inland category, the central estimate median was well below the reference, but nearly 80% of the high-end biomarkers exceeded it.
Fig. 3. Distributions of central estimate for total mercury in hair (THHg) reported in selected studies of women and infants from seafood-consuming populations, by exposure category
Fig. 4. Distributions of upper-bound total mercury in hair (THHg) reported in selected studies of women and infants from seafood-consuming populations, by exposure category
A majority (78%) of selected studies were based on convenience samples taken from seafood-consuming populations. Some details of the seafood context were provided in most (71%) studies, but in the others this information was sparse. Laboratory protocols for THHg and TBHg detection were nearly universally reported (91%). Most (82%) protocols were based on cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry (CV-AAS) or inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and a majority (74%) reported laboratory quality control procedures. In 86% of studies, distributions were transformed to lognormal scale and summarized using geometric means or medians. More than half (55%) of the studies reported maximums as high-end estimates, while the remainder reported 90th or 95th percentiles. Only 51% of studies reported some seafood intake data and 25% evaluated non-seafood sources of Hg.
We found that biomarkers of MeHg intake were of greatest health concern among three categories of seafood-consuming women and their infants: (i) rural riverside dwellers living near tropical small-scale gold mining with diets dependent on locally-caught freshwater fish; (ii) those in Arctic regions for whom apex food-chain marine mammals are a dietary staple; and (iii) coastal inhabitants, particularly in the Pacific and Mediterranean, who probably consume seafood that is primarily commercially sourced. In the first group, average Hg biomarkers suggest MeHg intake exceeds by several fold the level considered by WHO and FAO to pose no substantial risk of developmental neurotoxicity. In the second group, average biomarkers suggest MeHg intake well over the reference value. In the third group, biomarkers suggest an important share of the population approach or exceed the reference level. High-end biomarkers in all three groups indicate body burdens of MeHg in the range associated in epidemiological studies with observable neurological damage. While average biomarkers in other groups suggest that MeHg intake is below the recommended level, most upper bound biomarkers in these categories exceed the reference, which shows that even in groups with lower average exposure certain populations are at risk.
Before this study, few researchers had systematically compared the global exposures and risks linked to MeHg intake from seafood. Brune et al. reviewed Hg biomarker studies – published from 1976 to 1990 – of general populations exposed through various sources and found the highest values among seafood consumers in Greenland and Japan.197 Sioen et al. estimated contaminant and nutrient intake in general populations based on global seafood availability data and found the estimated MeHg intake to be highest in Japan and the Pacific islands, followed by the Nordic and Mediterranean regions.198 A recent European regional study examining biomarkers showed the highest MeHg exposure to be in Mediterranean countries.199 Our findings are broadly consistent with these studies and with the literature describing MeHg exposure and risk in specific subsistence fishing communities. This review adds to the evidence by synthesizing the findings from the two most recent decades of published international Hg biomarker data specifically for women and infants and by examining, in a single study, MeHg exposure in populations consuming self-caught and commercially purchased seafood.
Several limitations affect the interpretation of our results. Our goal was to compare MeHg exposure across various international groups of women and infants from seafood-consuming populations. However, incomplete reporting prevented us from evaluating the share of non-consumers of seafood in each study. Furthermore, most studies used convenience samples that may not have been representative of the populations from which they were taken. In sensitivity analysis we pooled biomarkers excluding the several large representative population surveys (which have a higher share of non-consumers of seafood than other studies). However, this did not alter our findings. Physiological differences in MeHg metabolism and elimination by life stage are well known200 and the FAO/WHO reference dose was established based on maternal biomarkers. Thus, in sensitivity analysis we also combined biomarkers excluding infants. This resulted in slightly lower medians for the Arctic and gold mining categories and higher ones for the coastal and inland categories.
TBHg is a better indicator of recent MeHg exposure than THHg, which is a better measure of longer-term MeHg exposure.3,4,6 Although this difference may be important among sporadic seafood consumers, the majority of our subpopulations were regular seafood consumers. Conversion of TBHg biomarkers to THHg equivalents is likely to have resulted in some measurement error. However, the range of hair-to-blood ratios reported in our studies was similar to the range on which the standard conversion ratio is based, which minimizes this bias.5 When we pooled only THHg biomarkers, medians were slightly higher across most categories (although some categories had few observations). Despite the use of laboratory methods that relied on commonly employed protocols, detection techniques are subject to variation3,11 and quality control practices were not uniformly reported. Sensitivity analysis examining only studies using CV-AAS or similar procedures resulted in slightly higher biomarkers for the Arctic category.
Population Hg biomarker distributions are often skewed to the right, so that central tendency is best captured by geometric means or medians.3 Thus, in reporting our main results we chose to exclude the small number of studies reporting only arithmetic means. Including arithmetic means yielded higher results for the inland category. To give greater weight to estimates from larger samples, we pooled biomarkers using sample-size weighting. Doing so yielded higher summary biomarkers in the Arctic and coastal categories. Variations in the share of MeHg in total Hg have been reported, both among frequent and infrequent seafood consumers,23,201 depending in part on exposure to Hg sources other than seafood (such as elemental Hg in dental amalgams or inorganic Hg compounds in skin-lightening creams).3,29 Most of the one quarter of selected studies examining non-seafood sources of Hg assessed the presence of dental amalgams, mainly in infrequent consumers of seafood; while this inorganic Hg source is best measured with urinary biomarkers, in cases where this exposure is important TBHg biomarkers may overestimate MeHg.26 We eliminated high outlier biomarkers due to suspected non-seafood sources wherever these were noted by authors (most were in subpopulations where skin-lightening creams were used). Nevertheless, other sources of Hg exposure influencing high-end measures cannot be excluded. These limitations in the underlying data suggest that our findings should be interpreted cautiously. However, most sensitivity analyses resulted in higher biomarker summary statistics than the main findings we report; we chose conservative assumptions for our main results.
Estimated IQ losses in infants born to seafood consuming mothers serve as an alternative means of characterizing the public health impact of MeHg exposure. As an illustration, we applied a dose–response relationship (0.18 infant IQ point lost for every ppm increase in maternal THHg)202 that has been used to estimate the economic costs associated with Hg contamination203,204 to our pooled upper bound biomarkers. The resulting interquartile range of estimated IQ loss spanned from 1 to 13 points for the gold mining, Arctic and coastal subpopulation categories. IQ losses at the higher end of this range may be sufficient to contribute to mild mental retardation, defined as an IQ between 50 and 69 points. Among subsistence fishing populations in the Amazon, an assessment of global burden of disease showed an incidence of mild mental retardation of up to 17.4 cases per 1000 infants205 and separate research identified MeHg-associated deficits in memory and learning in adults.206 IQ losses in the lower end of the range may contribute to borderline intellectual functioning, characterized by memory and executive function deficits.207 Although such minor losses in IQ may go unnoticed in an individual, they can cause an important shift in intellectual capacity at the population level, as documented in the case of lead.208 IQ loss represents only one facet of the neurological harm resulting from MeHg; our analysis did not include recent research suggesting neurological effects at lower dose11 or other documented effects, such as adverse cardiovascular outcomes.209
Systematic reviews provide an opportunity to identify gaps in a body of research. Small-scale gold mining is practiced in 70 countries,210 but we found Hg biomarker studies meeting our criteria in only six. We identified studies in 23 coastal countries, although per capita seafood consumption data suggest that many other such countries warrant study.20 Although reviews of subsistence fishing populations in the Amazon and Arctic are available, few have been conducted for coast-dwelling frequent seafood consumers (e.g. in south-eastern Asia or the Mediterranean) or for fishing populations near abandoned chloralkali plants and other aquatic sources of Hg contamination. We found population-based Hg biomonitoring surveys in only a handful of countries; most are high-income and have relatively low per capita seafood consumption.
It was beyond the scope of this review to assess time trends in Hg biomarkers. Without major policy changes, projections indicate that global anthropogenic Hg emissions are likely to increase.211 Moreover, modelling suggests that any reduction in Hg emissions is likely to take time to translate into reduced MeHg in seafood.212 Declines in Hg biomarkers in humans have been observed in association with changes in seafood consumption habits in various populations. This finding reinforces the importance of carefully designed public health messages intended to reduce MeHg exposure.199,212 In subsistence fishing populations, the cultural importance of seafood harvesting and the scarcity of alternative animal protein sources suggest the existence of complex tradeoffs in guiding seafood consumption and the need for well-targeted messages. In predominantly urban seafood-consuming coastal populations, commercial seafood advisories may be an appropriate choice for reaching at-risk populations.19 Because of seafood’s important nutritional benefits, all such messages should aim to encourage a shift away from large apex predator species and towards those with lower MeHg and higher polyunsaturated fatty acid content, rather than to reduce seafood intake.
In this review of biomarkers of MeHg intake in women and infants from 164 studies across 43 countries, we found a very high risk in tropical riverine populations near gold mining sites and in traditional Arctic populations. In both groups, biomarkers suggest average MeHg intake exceeds the FAO/WHO recommendation, although their share of the global total of seafood-consuming women and infants is likely to be fairly small. We also found an elevated risk among seafood consumers in the coastal regions of south-eastern Asia, the western Pacific and the Mediterranean; a large share of the world’s seafood-consuming women and their infants is likely to be found in this group because of its large population. In other populations for whom data were available, average indicators of risk were lower and generally within international intake recommendations. However, women and infants with high exposure to MeHg were evident across all exposure categories. Although sources of bias were present, these results should help to set broad priorities for preventive policy and research.
The findings of this review underscore the importance of WHO’s call for enhanced population monitoring and risk communication to women of reproductive age regarding healthful seafood choices.1 One of the provisions of the Minamata Convention aims to protect vulnerable populations from Hg exposure through public education and other measures.213 The Convention is a potentially important strategic tool to reach the populations at highest risk through development of seafood advisory risk messages for commercial seafood consumers, targeted community-based interventions for subsistence fishing groups and regular population surveillance.
- World Health Organization [Internet]. Mercury and health (Fact sheet No. 361). Geneva: WHO; 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs361/en/ [accessed 11 October 2013]
- “Minamata” Convention agreed by nations: global mercury agreement to lift health threats from lives of millions world-wide. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme; 2013. Available from: http://www.unep.org/hazardoussubstances/Portals/9/Mercury/Documents/INC5/press_release_mercury_Jan_19_2013.pdf [accessed 11 October 2013].
- Committee on Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury, National Research Council of the United States, National Academies of Science. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000.
- Clarkson TW, Magos L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 2006; 36: 609-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440600845619 pmid: 16973445.
- Environmental health criteria document 101: methylmercury. Geneva: International Program for Chemical Safety, World Health Organization; 1990.
- United Nations Environment Programme. DTIE Chemicals Branch. Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases; 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/chem/mercuryexposure.pdf [accessed 11October 2013].
- Crump KS, Kjellström T, Shipp AM, Silvers A, Stewart A. Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychological test performance: benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort. Risk Anal 1998; 18: 701-13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:RIAN.0000005917.52151.e6 pmid: 9972579.
- Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, et al., et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997; 19: 417-28 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-0362(97)00097-4 pmid: 9392777.
- Myers GJ, Marsh DO, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Tanner M, et al., et al. Main neurodevelopmental study of Seychellois children following in utero exposure to methylmercury from a maternal fish diet: outcome at six months. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16: 653-64 pmid: 8714870.
- Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. In: Sixty-first meeting, Rome, 10–19 June 2003: summary and conclusions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/jecfa/jecfa61sc.pdf [accessed 11 October 2013].
- Karagas MR, Choi AL, Oken E, Horvat M, Schoeny R, Kamai E, et al., et al. Evidence on the human health effects of low-level methylmercury exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2012; 120: 799-806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104494 pmid: 22275730.
- Mahaffey KR. Fish and shellfish as dietary sources of methylmercury and the omega-3 fatty acids, eicosahexaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid: risks and benefits. Environ Res 2004; 95: 414-28 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.02.006 pmid: 15220075.
- Mergler D, Anderson HA, Chan LHM, Mahaffey KR, Murray M, Sakamoto M, et al., Panel on Health Risks and Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury, et al. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: a worldwide concern. Ambio 2007; 36: 3-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[3:MEAHEI]2.0.CO;2 pmid: 17408186.
- Selin NE, Sunderland EM, Knightes CD, Mason RP. Sources of mercury exposure for US seafood consumers: implications for policy. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 137-43 pmid: 20056570.
- Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Nesheim MC, Yaktine AL, editors. Seafood choices: balancing benefits and risks. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.
- Mahaffey KR, Sunderland EM, Chan HM, Choi AL, Grandjean P, Mariën K, et al., et al. Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption. Nutr Rev 2011; 69: 493-508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-***************.x pmid: 21884130.
- Shimshack JP, Ward MB. Mercury advisories and household health trade-offs. J Health Econ 2010; 29: 674-85 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.05.001 pmid: 20609487.
- Lando AM, Zhang Y. Awareness and knowledge of methylmercury in fish in the United States. Environ Res 2011; 111: 442-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.004 pmid: 21257163.
- Sheehan MC. Risk of developmental neurotoxicity due to methylmercury in seafood: examining global exposures, susceptibility and policy. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Health Policy and Management Department; 2011. [Dissertation].
- The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: world review of fisheries and aquaculture – part 1. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e01.pdf [accessed 12 October 2013].
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, Population Estimates and Projections Section [Internet]. World population prospects: the 2012 revision – population by age groups – female. New York: United Nations; 2013. Available from: http://esa.un.org/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm [accessed 12 October 2013].
- United Nations Environment Programme. Vital water graphics: an overview of the state of the world’s fresh and and marine waters. 2nd ed. New York: United Nations; 2008. Available from: http://www.unep.org/dewa/vitalwater/article176.html [accessed 12 October 2013].
- Passos CJ, Mergler D. Human mercury exposure and adverse health effects in the Amazon: a review. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24: S503-20.
- Van Oostdam J, Donaldson SG, Feeley M, Arnold D, Ayotte P, Bondy G, et al., et al. Human health implications of environmental contaminants in Arctic Canada: A review. Sci Total Environ 2005; 351-352: 165-246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.034 pmid: 16297438.
- Committee on Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Toxicants, National Research Council of the United States National Academies of Science. Human biomonitoring for environmental chemicals. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.
- Berglund M, Lind B, Björnberg KA, Palm B, Einarsson O, Vahter M. Inter-individual variations of human mercury exposure biomarkers: a cross-sectional assessment. Environ Health 2005; 4: 20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-4-20 pmid: 16202128.
- Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al., et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 pmid: 10789670.
- Pirrone N, Mahaffey K. Dynamics of mercury pollution on regional and global scales: atmospheric processes and human exposures around the world. New York: Springer; 2005.
- Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Bodurow CC. Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112: 562-70 pmid: 15064162.
- Groth E 3rd. Ranking the contributions of commercial fish and shellfish varieties to mercury exposure in the United States: implications for risk communication. Environ Res 2010; 110: 226-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.12.006 pmid: 20116785.
- Balshaw S, Edwards J, Daughtry B, Ross K. Mercury in seafood: mechanisms of accumulation and consequences for consumer health. Rev Environ Health 2007; 22: 91-113 pmid: 17894202.
- Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Jeffries RA. Adult women’s blood mercury concentrations vary regionally in the United States: association with patterns of fish consumption (NHANES 1999–2004). Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117: 47-53 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11674 pmid: 19165386.
- Monrroy SX, Lopez RW, Roulet M, Benefice E. Lifestyle and mercury contamination of Amerindian populations along the Beni river (lowland Bolivia). J Environ Health 2008; 71: 44-50 pmid: 19004394.
- Barbieri FL, Cournil A, Gardon J. Mercury exposure in a high fish eating Bolivian Amazonian population with intense small-scale gold-mining activities. Int J Environ Health Res 2009; 19: 267-77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603120802559342 pmid: 20183195.
- Boischio AAP, Barbosa A. Exposição ao mercúrio orgânico em populações Ribeirinhas do Alto Madeira, Rondônia, 1991: resultados preliminares. Cad Saude Publica 1993; 9: 155-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1993000200006 pmid: 15448836.
- Barbosa AC, Silva SRL, Dórea JG. Concentration of mercury in hair of indigenous mothers and infants from the Amazon basin. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1998; 34: 100-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002449900291 pmid: 9419279.
- Lebel J, Mergler D, Branches F, Lucotte M, Amorim M, Larribe F, et al., et al. Neurotoxic effects of low-level methylmercury contamination in the Amazonian Basin. Environ Res 1998; 79: 20-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3846 pmid: 9756677.
- Grandjean P, White RF, Nielsen A, Cleary D, de Oliveira Santos EC. Methylmercury neurotoxicity in Amazonian children downstream from gold mining. Environ Health Perspect 1999; 107: 587-91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107587 pmid: 10379006.
- Amorim MIM, Mergler D, Bahia MO, Dubeau H, Miranda D, Lebel J, et al., et al. Cytogenetic damage related to low levels of methyl mercury contamination in the Brazilian Amazon. An Acad Bras Cienc 2000; 72: 497-507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652000000400004.
- Boischio AA, Henshel D. Fish consumption, fish lore, and mercury pollution–risk communication for the Madeira River people. Environ Res 2000; 84: 108-26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2000.4035 pmid: 11068924.
- Dolbec J, Mergler D, Sousa Passos CJ, Sousa de Morais S, Lebel J. Methylmercury exposure affects motor performance of a riverine population of the Tapajós river, Brazilian Amazon. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000; 73: 195-203 pmid: 10787135.
- Harada M, Nakanishi J, Yasoda E, Pinheiro MCN, Oikawa T, de Assis Guimarâes G, et al., et al. Mercury pollution in the Tapajos River basin, Amazon: mercury level of head hair and health effects. Environ Int 2001; 27: 285-90 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00059-9 pmid: 11686639.
- Crompton P, Ventura AM, de Souza JM, Santos E, Strickland GT, Silbergeld E. Assessment of mercury exposure and malaria in a Brazilian Amazon riverine community. Environ Res 2002; 90: 69-75 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4358 pmid: 12483796.
- Santos ECO, de Jesus IM, Câmara VdeM, Brabo E, Loureiro ECB, Mascarenhas A, et al., et al. Mercury exposure in Munduruku Indians from the community of Sai Cinza, State of Pará, Brazil. Environ Res 2002; 90: 98-103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4389 pmid: 12483799.
- Santos ECO, Câmara VdeM, Brabo EdaS, Loureiro ECB, de Jesus IM, Fayal K, et al., et al. Avaliação dos níveis de exposição ao mercúrio entre índios Pakaanóva, Amazônia, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 2003; 19: 199-206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2003000100022 pmid: 12700799.
- Santos EO, Jesus IM, Câmara VdeM, Brabo EdaS, Jesus MI, Fayal KF, et al., et al. Correlation between blood mercury levels in mothers and newborns in Itaituba, Pará State, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2007; 23: S622-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007001600022 pmid: 18038043.
- Passos CJ, Da Silva DS, Lemire M, Fillion M, Guimarães JR, Lucotte M, et al., et al. Daily mercury intake in fish-eating populations in the Brazilian Amazon. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 76-87 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500599 pmid: 17805232.
- Grotto D, Valentini J, Fillion M, Passos CJ, Garcia SC, Mergler D, et al., et al. Mercury exposure and oxidative stress in communities of the Brazilian Amazon. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 806-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.053 pmid: 19914681.
- Fillion M, Lemire M, Philibert A, Frenette B, Weiler HA, Deguire JR, et al., et al. Visual acuity in fish consumers of the Brazilian Amazon: risks and benefits from local diet. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 2236-44 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980011001765 pmid: 21896241.
- Dórea JG, Marques RC, Isejima C. Neurodevelopment of Amazonian infants: antenatal and postnatal exposure to methyl- and ethylmercury. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012; 2012: 132876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/132876.
- Barcelos GR, Grotto D, de Marco KC, Valentini J, Lengert AV, de Oliveira AA, et al., et al. Polymorphisms in glutathione-related genes modify mercury concentrations and antioxidant status in subjects environmentally exposed to methylmercury. Sci Total Environ 2013; 6: 319-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.029.
- Marques RC, Bernardi JVE, Dórea JG, Brandão KG, Bueno L, Leão RS, et al., et al. Fish consumption during pregnancy, mercury transfer, and birth weight along the Madeira River Basin in Amazonia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2013; 10: 2150-63 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062150 pmid: 23759951.
- Vieira SM, de Almeida R, Holanda IBB, Mussy MH, Galvão RCF, Crispim PTB, et al., et al. Total and methyl-mercury in hair and milk of mothers living in the city of Porto Velho and in villages along the Rio Madeira, Amazon, Brazil. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2013; 216: 682-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.011 pmid: 23340120.
- Olivero-Verbel J, Caballero-Gallardo K, Marrugo Negrete J. Relationship between localization of gold mining areas and hair mercury levels in people from Bolivar, north of Colombia. Biol Trace Elem Res 2011; 144: 118-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-011-9046-5 pmid: 21476008.
- Cordier S, Grasmick C, Paquier-Passelaigue M, Mandereau L, Weber J-P, Jouan M. Mercury exposure in French Guiana: levels and determinants. Arch Environ Health 1998; 53: 299-303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039899809605712.
- Cordier S, Garel M, Mandereau L, Morcel HH, Doineau P, Gosme-Seguret S, et al., et al. Neurodevelopmental investigations among methylmercury-exposed children in French Guiana. Environ Res 2002; 89: 1-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4349.
- Fujimura M, Matsuyama A, Harvard JP, Bourdineaud JP, Nakamura K. Mercury contamination in humans in Upper Maroni, French Guiana between 2004 and 2009. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2012; 88: 135-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0497-3 pmid: 22147084.
- Bose-O’Reilly S, Drasch G, Beinhoff C, Rodrigues-Filho S, Roider G, Lettmeier B, et al., et al. Health assessment of artisanal gold miners in Indonesia. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 713-25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.070 pmid: 19945736.
- Hacon S, Yokoo E, Valente J, Campos RC, da Silva VA, de Menezes ACC, et al., et al. Exposure to mercury in pregnant women from Alta Floresta-Amazon basin, Brazil. Environ Res 2000; 84: 204-10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2000.4115 pmid: 11097793.
- Marques RC, Garrofe Dórea J, Rodrigues Bastos W, de Freitas Rebelo M, de Freitas Fonseca M, Malm O. Maternal mercury exposure and neuro-motor development in breastfed infants from Porto Velho (Amazon), Brazil. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2007; 210: 51-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.08.001 pmid: 17011234.
- Mohan S, Tiller M, van der Voet G, Kanhai H. Mercury exposure of mothers and newborns in Surinam: a pilot study. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2005; 43: 101-4 pmid: 15822761.
- Dewailly E, Ayotte P, Bruneau S, Lebel G, Levallois P, Weber JP. Exposure of the Inuit population of Nunavik (Arctic Quebec) to lead and mercury. Arch Environ Health 2001; 56: 350-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039890109604467 pmid: 11572279.
- Muckle G, Ayotte P, Dewailly E, Jacobson SW, Jacobson JL. Prenatal exposure of the northern Québec Inuit infants to environmental contaminants. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109: 1291-9 pmid: 11748038.
- Lucas M, Dewailly E, Muckle G, Ayotte P, Bruneau S, Gingras S, et al., et al. Gestational age and birth weight in relation to n-3 fatty acids among Inuit (Canada). Lipids 2004; 39: 617-26 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11745-004-1274-7 pmid: 15588018.
- Butler Walker J, Houseman J, Seddon L, McMullen E, Tofflemire K, Mills C, et al., et al. Maternal and umbilical cord blood levels of mercury, lead, cadmium, and essential trace elements in Arctic Canada. Environ Res 2006; 100: 295-318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2005.05.006 pmid: 16081062.
- Fontaine J, Dewailly E, Benedetti J-L, Pereg D, Ayotte P, Déry S. Re-evaluation of blood mercury, lead and cadmium concentrations in the Inuit population of Nunavik (Québec): a cross-sectional study. Environ Health 2008; 7: 25 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-7-25 pmid: 18518986.
- Grandjean P, Weihe P, Jørgensen PJ, Clarkson T, Cernichiari E, Viderø T. Impact of maternal seafood diet on fetal exposure to mercury, selenium, and lead. Arch Environ Health 1992; 47: 185-95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1992.9938348 pmid: 1596101.
- Bjerregaard P, Hansen JC. Organochlorines and heavy metals in pregnant women from the Disko Bay area in Greenland. Sci Total Environ 2000; 245: 195-202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00444-1 pmid: 10682367.
- Nielsen ABS, Davidsen M, Bjerregaard P. The association between blood pressure and whole blood methylmercury in a cross-sectional study among Inuit in Greenland. Environ Health 2012; 11: 44 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-44 pmid: 22747793.
- Odland JO, Nieboer E, Romanova N, Thomassen Y, Brox J, Lund E. Self-reported ethnic status of delivering women, newborn body mass index, blood or urine concentrations of toxic metals, and essential elements in sera of Norwegian and Russian Arctic populations. Int J Circumpolar Health 1999; 58: 4-13 pmid: 10208065.
- Hansen S, Nieboer E, Sandanger TM, Wilsgaard T, Thomassen Y, Veyhe AS, et al., et al. Changes in maternal blood concentrations of selected essential and toxic elements during and after pregnancy. J Environ Monit 2011; 13: 2143-52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1em10051c pmid: 21738945.
- Klopov VP. Levels of heavy metals in women residing in the Russian Arctic. Int J Circumpolar Health 1998; 57: 582-5 pmid: 10093346.
- Arnold SM, Lynn TV, Verbrugge LA, Middaugh JP. Human biomonitoring to optimize fish consumption advice: reducing uncertainty when evaluating benefits and risks. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 393-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.042879 pmid: 15727965.
- Nilson SA, Costa M, Akagi H. Total and methylmercury levels of a coastal human population and of fish from the Brazilian northeast. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2001; 8: 280-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02987408 pmid: 11601365.
- Kuno R, Roquetti MH, Becker K, Seiwert M, Gouveia N. Reference values for lead, cadmium and mercury in blood of adults from the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo (Brazil). Toxicol Letters 2010; 196: 1(S40).
- Bruhn CG, Rodŕiguez AA, Barrios C, Jaramillo VH, Becerra J, Gonzáles U, et al., et al. Determination of total mercury in scalp hair of pregnant and nursing women resident in fishing villages in the Eighth Region of Chile. J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis 1994; 8: 79-86 pmid: 7881281.
- Li Z, Wang Q, Luo Y. Exposure of the urban population to mercury in Changchun city, Northeast China. Environ Geochem Health 2006; 28: 61-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-005-9012-2 pmid: 16528593.
- Zhang L, Wang Q. Preliminary study on health risk from mercury exposure to residents of Wujiazhan town on the Di’er Songhua river, Northeast China. Environ Geochem Health 2006; 28: 67-71 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-005-9013-1 pmid: 16528592.
- Tang D, Li T-Y, Liu JJ, Zhou Z-J, Yuan T, Chen Y-H, et al., et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to coal-burning pollutants on children’s development in China. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 674-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10471 pmid: 18470301.
- Fang T, Aronson KJ, Campbell LM. Freshwater fish-consumption relations with total hair mercury and selenium among women in eastern China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2012; 62: 323-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-011-9689-4 pmid: 21713402.
- Pawlas N, Strömberg U, Carlberg B, Cerna M, Harari F, Harari R, et al., et al. Cadmium, mercury and lead in the blood of urban women in Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, China, Ecuador and Morocco. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2013; 26: 58-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/S13382-013-0071-9 pmid: 23526195.
- Olivero-Verbel J, Johnson-Restrepo B, Baldiris-Avila R, Güette-Fernández J, Magallanes-Carreazo E, Vanegas-Ramírez L, et al., et al. Human and crab exposure to mercury in the Caribbean coastal shoreline of Colombia: impact from an abandoned chlor-alkali plant. Environ Int 2008; 34: 476-82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.10.009 pmid: 18155151.
- Madeddu A, Sciacca S. Monitoraggio biologico sulla presenza di Hg, PCB e HCG in latte e capelli di donne residenti in un’area ad alta incidenza di nati malformati (Augusta). Ann Ig 2008; 20: 59-64 pmid: 18773607.
- Deroma L, Parpinel M, Tognin V, Channoufi L, Tratnik J, Horvat M, et al., et al. Neuropsychological assessment at school-age and prenatal low-level exposure to mercury through fish consumption in an Italian birth cohort living near a contaminated site. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2013; 216: 486-93 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.02.004 pmid: 23523155.
- Hsiao H-W, Ullrich SM, Tanton TW. Burdens of mercury in residents of Temirtau, Kazakhstan I: hair mercury concentrations and factors of elevated hair mercury levels. Sci Total Environ 2011; 409: 2272-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.040 pmid: 20092877.
- Lim S, Chung H-U, Paek D. Low dose mercury and heart rate variability among community residents nearby to an industrial complex in Korea. Neurotoxicology 2010; 31: 10-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2009.10.001 pmid: 19833149.
- Trasande L, Cortes JE, Landrigan PJ, Abercrombie MI, Bopp RF, Cifuentes E. Methylmercury exposure in a subsistence fishing community in Lake Chapala, Mexico: an ecological approach. Environ Health 2010; 9: 1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-9-1 pmid: 20064246.
- Elhamri H, Idrissi L, Coquery M, Azemard S, El Abidi A, Benlemlih M, et al., et al. Hair mercury levels in relation to fish consumption in a community of the Moroccan Mediterranean coast. Food Addit Contam 2007; 24: 1236-46 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030701329611 pmid: 17852400.
- Lacayo M, Cruz A, Lacayo J, Fomsgaard I. Mercury contamination in Lake Xolotlan (Managua). Hydrobiol Bull 1991; 25: 173-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02291251.
- Bravo AG, Loizeau J-L, Bouchet S, Richard A, Rubin JF, Ungureanu V-G, et al., et al. Mercury human exposure through fish consumption in a reservoir contaminated by a chlor-alkali plant: Babeni reservoir (Romania). Environ Sci Pollut Res 2010; 17: 1422-32 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0328-9.
- Palkovicova L, Ursinyova M, Masanova V, Yu Z, Hertz-Picciotto I. Maternal amalgam dental fillings as the source of mercury exposure in developing fetus and newborn. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 326-31 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500606 pmid: 17851449.
- Oskarsson A, Lagerkvist BJ, Ohlin B, Lundberg K. Mercury levels in the hair of pregnant women in a polluted area in Sweden. Sci Total Environ 1994; 151: 29-35 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(94)90483-9 pmid: 8079150.
- Chang J-W, Pai M-C, Chen H-L, Guo H-R, Su H-J, Lee C-C. Cognitive function and blood methylmercury in adults living near a deserted chloralkali factory. Environ Res 2008; 108: 334-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.06.006 pmid: 18675410.
- Lincoln RA, Shine JP, Chesney EJ, Vorhees DJ, Grandjean P, Senn DB. Fish consumption and mercury exposure among Louisiana recreational anglers. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 245-51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002609 pmid: 20980220.
- Rojas M, Nakamura K, Seijas D, Squiuante G, Pieters MA, Infante S. Mercury in hair as a biomarker of exposure in a coastal Venezuelan population. Invest Clin 2007; 48: 305-15 pmid: 17853790.
- Black FJ, Bokhutlo T, Somoxa A, Maethamako M, Modisaemang O, Kemosedile T, et al., et al. The tropical African mercury anomaly: lower than expected mercury concentrations in fish and human hair. Sci Total Environ 2011; 409: 1967-75 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.027 pmid: 21342703.
- Girard M, Dumont C. Exposure of James Bay Cree to methylmercury during pregnancy for the years 1983–91. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995; 80: 13-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01189648.
- Mahaffey KR, Mergler D. Blood levels of total and organic mercury in residents of the upper St. Lawrence River basin, Québec: association with age, gender, and fish consumption. Environ Res 1998; 77: 104-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3834 pmid: 9600803.
- Belles-Isles M, Ayotte P, Dewailly E, Weber J-P, Roy R. Cord blood lymphocyte functions in newborns from a remote maritime population exposed to organochlorines and methylmercury. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2002; 65: 165-82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/152873902753396794 pmid: 11820504.
- Cole DC, Kearney J, Sanin LH, Leblanc A, Weber J-P. Blood mercury levels among Ontario anglers and sport-fish eaters. Environ Res 2004; 95: 305-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2003.08.012 pmid: 15220065.
- Morrissette J, Takser L, St-Amour G, Smargiassi A, Lafond J, Mergler D. Temporal variation of blood and hair mercury levels in pregnancy in relation to fish consumption history in a population living along the St. Lawrence River. Environ Res 2004; 95: 363-74 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2003.12.007 pmid: 15220070.
- Abdelouahab N, Mergler D, Takser L, Vanier C, St-Jean M, Baldwin M, et al., et al. Gender differences in the effects of organochlorines, mercury, and lead on thyroid hormone levels in lakeside communities of Quebec (Canada). Environ Res 2008; 107: 380-92 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.01.006 pmid: 18313043.
- Jenssen MTS, Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Larssen T, Kvalem HE, et al., et al. Dietary mercury exposure in a population with a wide range of fish consumption–self-capture of fish and regional differences are important determinants of mercury in blood. Sci Total Environ 2012; 439: 220-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.024 pmid: 23069934.
- Johnsson C, Sällsten G, Schütz A, Sjörs A, Barregård L. Hair mercury levels versus freshwater fish consumption in household members of Swedish angling societies. Environ Res 2004; 96: 257-63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.01.005 pmid: 15364592.
- Stewart P, Reihman J, Lonky E, Darvill T, Pagano J. Prenatal PCB exposure and neonatal behavioral assessment scale (NBAS) performance. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2000; 22: 21-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0892-0362(99)00056-2 pmid: 10642111.
- Knobeloch L, Gliori G, Anderson H. Assessment of methylmercury exposure in Wisconsin. Environ Res 2007; 103: 205-10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.012 pmid: 16831413.
- Schantz SL, Gardiner JC, Aguiar A, Tang X, Gasior DM, Sweeney AM, et al., et al. Contaminant profiles in Southeast Asian immigrants consuming fish from polluted waters in northeastern Wisconsin. Environ Res 2010; 110: 33-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.09.003 pmid: 19811781.
- Carneiro MFH, Moresco MB, Chagas GR, de Oliveira Souza VC, Rhoden CR, Barbosa F. Assessment of trace elements in scalp hair of a young urban population in Brazil. Biol Trace Elem Res 2011; 143: 815-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-010-8947-z pmid: 21225477.
- Legrand M, Arp P, Ritchie C, Chan HM. Mercury exposure in two coastal communities of the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Environ Res 2005; 98: 14-21 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.07.006 pmid: 15721879.
- Albert I, Villeret G, Paris A, Verger P. Integrating variability in half-lives and dietary intakes to predict mercury concentration in hair. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2010; 58: 482-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.020 pmid: 20804806.
- Drouillet-Pinard P, Huel G, Slama R, Forhan A, Sahuquillo J, Goua V, et al., et al. Prenatal mercury contamination: relationship with maternal seafood consumption during pregnancy and fetal growth in the ‘EDEN mother-child’ cohort. Br J Nutr 2010; 104: 1096-100 pmid: 20487582.
- Vahter M, Akesson A, Lind B, Björs U, Schütz A, Berglund M. Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood. Environ Res 2000; 84: 186-94 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2000.4098 pmid: 11068932.
- Björnberg KA, Vahter M, Petersson-Grawé K, Glynn A, Cnattingius S, Darnerud PO, et al., et al. Methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in Swedish pregnant women and in cord blood: influence of fish consumption. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111: 637-41 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5618 pmid: 12676628.
- Rosborg I, Nihlgård B, Gerhardsson L. Hair element concentrations in females in one acid and one alkaline area in southern Sweden. Ambio 2003; 32: 440-6 pmid: 14703901.
- Brantsaeter AL, Haugen M, Thomassen Y, Ellingsen DG, Ydersbond TA, Hagve TA, et al., et al. Exploration of biomarkers for total fish intake in pregnant Norwegian women. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 54-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980009005904 pmid: 19490733.
- Gerhardsson L, Lundh T. Metal concentrations in blood and hair in pregnant females in southern Sweden. J Environ Health 2010; 72: 37-41 pmid: 20104833.
- Renzoni A, Zino F, Franchi E. Mercury levels along the food chain and risk for exposed populations. Environ Res 1998; 77: 68-72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3832 pmid: 9600797.
- Ramon R, Murcia M, Aguinagalde X, Amurrio A, Llop S, Ibarluzea J, et al., et al. Prenatal mercury exposure in a multicenter cohort study in Spain. Environ Int 2011; 37: 597-604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2010.12.004 pmid: 21239061.
- Björnberg KA, Vahter M, Grawé KP, Berglund M. Methyl mercury exposure in Swedish women with high fish consumption. Sci Total Environ 2005; 341: 45-52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.033 pmid: 15833240.
- Bates CJ, Prentice A, Birch MC, Delves HT. Dependence of blood indices of selenium and mercury on estimated fish intake in a national survey of British adults. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10: 508-17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980007246683 pmid: 17411472.
- Dewailly E, Rouja P, Forde M, Peek-Ball C, Côté S, Smith E, et al., et al. Evaluation of a public health intervention to lower mercury exposure from fish consumption in Bermuda. PLoS One 2012; 7: e47388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047388 pmid: 23077607.
- Stern AH, Gochfeld M, Weisel C, Burger J. Mercury and methylmercury exposure in the New Jersey pregnant population. Arch Environ Health 2001; 56: 4-10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039890109604048 pmid: 11256856.
- Ortiz-Roque C, López-Rivera Y. Mercury contamination in reproductive age women in a Caribbean island: Vieques. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 756-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.019224 pmid: 15310801.
- Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, Bellinger D, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Hu H, et al., et al. Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a U.S. Cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 1376-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8041 pmid: 16203250.
- McKelvey W, Gwynn RC, Jeffery N, Kass D, Thorpe LE, Garg RK, et al., et al. A biomonitoring study of lead, cadmium, and mercury in the blood of New York city adults. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 1435-41 pmid: 17938732.
- Karouna-Renier NK, Ranga Rao K, Lanza JJ, Rivers SD, Wilson PA, Hodges DK, et al., et al. Mercury levels and fish consumption practices in women of child-bearing age in the Florida Panhandle. Environ Res 2008; 108: 320-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.08.005 pmid: 18814872.
- Lederman SA, Jones RL, Caldwell KL, Rauh V, Sheets SE, Tang D, et al., et al. Relation between cord blood mercury levels and early child development in a World Trade Center cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 1085-91 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10831 pmid: 18709170.
- Caldwell KL, Mortensen ME, Jones RL, Caudill SP, Osterloh JD. Total blood mercury concentrations in the U.S. population: 1999–2006. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009; 212: 588-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.04.004 pmid: 19481974.
- Wells EM, Jarrett JM, Lin YH, Caldwell KL, Hibbeln JR, Apelberg BJ, et al., et al. Body burdens of mercury, lead, selenium and copper among Baltimore newborns. Environ Res 2011; 111: 411-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2010.12.009 pmid: 21277575.
- King E, Shih G, Ratnapradipa D, Quilliam DN, Morton J, Magee SR. Mercury, lead, and cadmium in umbilical cord blood. J Environ Health 2013; 75: 38-43 pmid: 23397648.
- Traynor S, Kearney G, Olson D, Hilliard A, Palcic J, Pawlowicz M. Fish consumption patterns and mercury exposure levels among women of childbearing age in Duval County, Florida. J Environ Health 2013; 75: 8-15 pmid: 23397644.
- Babi D, Vasjari M, Celo V, Koroveshi M. Some results on Hg content in hair in different populations in Albania. Sci Total Environ 2000; 259: 55-60 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00549-0 pmid: 11032135.
- Miklavčič A, Casetta A, Snoj Tratnik J, Mazej D, Krsnik M, Mariuz M, et al., et al. Mercury, arsenic and selenium exposure levels in relation to fish consumption in the Mediterranean area. Environ Res 2013; 120: 7-17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.08.010 pmid: 22999706.
- Gibičar D, Horvat M, Nakou S, Sarafidou J, Yager J. Pilot study of intrauterine exposure to methylmercury in Eastern Aegean islands, Greece. Sci Total Environ 2006; 367: 586-95 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.017 pmid: 16549105.
- Vardavas CI, Patelarou E, Grandér M, Chatzi L, Palm B, Fthenou E, et al., et al. The association between active/passive smoking and toxic metals among pregnant women in Greece. Xenobiotica 2011; 41: 456-63 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00498254.2011.559294 pmid: 21381896.
- Fakour H, Esmaili-Sari A, Zayeri F. Mercury exposure assessment in Iranian women’s hair of a port town with respect to fish consumption and amalgam fillings. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 1538-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.01.008 pmid: 20100624.
- Salehi Z, Esmaili-Sari A. Hair mercury levels in pregnant women in Mahshahr, Iran: fish consumption as a determinant of exposure. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 4848-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.027 pmid: 20655095.
- Barghi M, Behrooz RD, Esmaili-Sari A, Ghasempouri SM. Mercury exposure assessment in Iranian pregnant women’s hair with respect to diet, amalgam filling, and lactation. Biol Trace Elem Res 2012; 148: 292-301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9384-y pmid: 22419376.
- Okati N, Sari AE, Ghasempouri SM. Hair mercury concentrations of lactating mothers and breastfed infants in Iran (fish consumption and mercury exposure). Biol Trace Elem Res 2012; 149: 155-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-012-9424-7 pmid: 22592844.
- Díez S, Montuori P, Pagano A, Sarnacchiaro P, Bayona JM, Triassi M. Hair mercury levels in an urban population from southern Italy: fish consumption as a determinant of exposure. Environ Int 2008; 34: 162-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.07.015 pmid: 17904222.
- Bou-Olayan AH, Al-Yakoob SN. Mercury in human hair: a study of residents in Kuwait. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 1994; A29: 1541-51.
- Khassouani CD, Soulaymani R, Jana M, Mauras Y, Allain P. Blood mercury concentrations in the population of Rabat area, Morocco. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2001; 66: 439-42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-001-0025-y pmid: 11443304.
- Myers GJ, Marsh DO, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Tanner M, et al., et al. Main neurodevelopmental study of Seychellois children following in utero exposure to methylmercury from a maternal fish diet: outcome at six months. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16: 653-64 pmid: 8714870.
- Channa K, Odland JØ, Kootbodien T, Theodorou P, Naik I, Sandanger TM, et al., et al. Differences in prenatal exposure to mercury in South African communities residing along the Indian Ocean. Sci Total Environ 2013; 463-464: 11-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.055 pmid: 23787104.
- Rudge CV, Röllin HB, Nogueira CM, Thomassen Y, Rudge MC, Odland JO. The placenta as a barrier for toxic and essential elements in paired maternal and cord blood samples of South African delivering women. J Environ Monit 2009; 11: 1322-30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b903805a pmid: 20449220.
- Soria ML, Sanz P, Martínez D, López-Artíguez M, Garrido R, Grilo A, et al., et al. Total mercury and methylmercury in hair, maternal and umbilical blood, and placenta from women in the Seville area. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 1992; 48: 494-501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00199063 pmid: 1504492.
- Unuvar E, Ahmadov H, Kiziler AR, Aydemir B, Toprak S, Ulker V, et al., et al. Mercury levels in cord blood and meconium of healthy newborns and venous blood of their mothers: clinical, prospective cohort study. Sci Total Environ 2007; 374: 60-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.043 pmid: 17258795.
- Choy CMY, Lam CWK, Cheung LTF, Briton-Jones CM, Cheung LP, Haines CJ. Infertility, blood mercury concentrations and dietary seafood consumption: a case-control study. BJOG 2002; 109: 1121-5 pmid: 12387464.
- Fok TF, Lam HS, Ng PC, Yip AS, Sin NC, Chan IH, et al., et al. Fetal methylmercury exposure as measured by cord blood mercury concentrations in a mother-infant cohort in Hong Kong. Environ Int 2007; 33: 84-92 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.08.002 pmid: 16962662.
- Gao Y, Yan CH, Tian Y, Wang Y, Xie HF, Zhou X, et al., et al. Prenatal exposure to mercury and neurobehavioral development of neonates in Zhoushan City, China. Environ Res 2007; 105: 390-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.05.015 pmid: 17655840.
- Liu X, Cheng J, Song Y, Honda S, Wang L, Liu Z, et al., et al. Mercury concentration in hair samples from Chinese people in coastal cities. J Environ Sci (China) 2008; 20: 1258-62 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62218-4 pmid: 19143352.
- Dewailly E, Suhas E, Mou Y, Dallaire R, Chateau-Degat L, Chansin R. High fish consumption in French Polynesia and prenatal exposure to metals and nutrients. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2008; 17: 461-70 pmid: 18818168.
- Nakagawa R. Concentration of mercury in hair of Japanese people. Chemosphere 1995; 30: 127-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(94)00382-5 pmid: 7874463.
- Iwasaki Y, Sakamoto M, Nakai K, Oka T, Dakeishi M, Iwata T, et al., et al. Estimation of daily mercury intake from seafood in Japanese women: Akita cross-sectional study. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003; 200: 67-73 http://dx.doi.org/10.1620/tjem.200.67 pmid: 12962403.
- Yasutake A, Matsumoto M, Yamaguchi M, Hachiya N. Current hair mercury levels in Japanese: survey in five districts. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003; 199: 161-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1620/tjem.199.161 pmid: 12703660.
- Arakawa C, Yoshinaga J, Okamura K, Nakai K, Satoh H. Fish consumption and time to pregnancy in Japanese women. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2006; 209: 337-44 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.02.004 pmid: 16735138.
- Ohno T, Sakamoto M, Kurosawa T, Dakeishi M, Iwata T, Murata K. Total mercury levels in hair, toenail, and urine among women free from occupational exposure and their relations to renal tubular function. Environ Res 2007; 103: 191-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.009 pmid: 16890218.
- Sakamoto M, Kaneoka T, Murata K, Nakai K, Satoh H, Akagi H. Correlations between mercury concentrations in umbilical cord tissue and other biomarkers of fetal exposure to methylmercury in the Japanese population. Environ Res 2007; 103: 106-11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2006.03.004 pmid: 16650842.
- Sakamoto M, Kubota M, Murata K, Nakai K, Sonoda I, Satoh H. Changes in mercury concentrations of segmental maternal hair during gestation and their correlations with other biomarkers of fetal exposure to methylmercury in the Japanese population. Environ Res 2008; 106: 270-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.10.002 pmid: 18054904.
- Miyake Y, Tanaka K, Yasutake A, Sasaki S, Hirota Y. Lack of association of mercury with risk of wheeze and eczema in Japanese children: the Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. Environ Res 2011; 111: 1180-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.07.003 pmid: 21807364.
- Kim EH, Kim IK, Kwon JY, Kim SW, Park YW. The effect of fish consumption on blood mercury levels of pregnant women. Yonsei Med J 2006; 47: 626-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.5.626 pmid: 17066506.
- Kim SA, Jeon CK, Paek DM. Hair mercury concentrations of children and mothers in Korea: implication for exposure and evaluation. Sci Total Environ 2008; 402: 36-42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.010 pmid: 18502474.
- Jo E-M, Kim B-G, Kim Y-M, Yu S-D, You C-H, Kim J-Y, et al., et al. Blood mercury concentration and related factors in an urban coastal area in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2010; 43: 377-86 http://dx.doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.5.377 pmid: 20959708.
- Kim NS, Lee BK. Blood total mercury and fish consumption in the Korean general population in KNHANES III, 2005. Sci Total Environ 2010; 408: 4841-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.026 pmid: 20619878.
- Lee B-E, Hong Y-C, Park H, Ha M, Koo BS, Chang N, et al., et al. Interaction between GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphism and blood mercury on birth weight. Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118: 437-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/0900731 pmid: 20194072.
- Kim BM, Lee BE, Hong YC, Park H, Ha M, Kim YJ, et al., et al. Mercury levels in maternal and cord blood and attained weight through the 24 months of life. Sci Total Environ 2011; 410-411: 26-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.060 pmid: 22000783.
- Kim Y, Lee BK. Associations of blood lead, cadmium, and mercury with estimated glomerular filtration rate in the Korean general population: analysis of 2008–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Environ Res 2012; 118: 124-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.06.003 pmid: 22749111.
- You C-H, Kim B-G, Jo E-M, Kim G-Y, Yu B-C, Hong M-G, et al., et al. The relationship between the fish consumption and blood total/methyl-mercury concentration of costal area in Korea. NeuroToxicol 2012; 33: 676-82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2012.04.005.
- Eom SY, Choi SH, Ahn SJ, Kim DK, Kim DW, Lim JA, et al., et al. Reference levels of blood mercury and association with metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013 [Epub]. 10.1007/s00420-013-0891-8
- Hong D, Cho SH, Park SJ, Kim SY, Park SB. Hair mercury level in smokers and its influence on blood pressure and lipid metabolism. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2013; 36: 103-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2013.03.007 pmid: 23603462.
- Kim N-Y, Ahn S-J, Ryu D-Y, Choi B-S, Kim H, Yu I-J, et al., et al. Effect of lifestyles on the blood mercury level in Korean adults. Hum Exp Toxicol 2013; 32: 591-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327112467041 pmid: 23155199.
- Marsh DO, Turner MD, Smith JC, Allen P, Richdale N. Fetal methylmercury study in a Peruvian fish-eating population. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16: 717-26 pmid: 8714876.
- Hsu C-S, Liu P-L, Chien L-C, Chou S-Y, Han B-C. Mercury concentration and fish consumption in Taiwanese pregnant women. BJOG 2007; 114: 81-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01142.x pmid: 17081179.
- Chien L-C, Gao C-S, Lin H-H. Hair mercury concentration and fish consumption: risk and perceptions of risk among women of childbearing age. Environ Res 2010; 110: 123-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.001 pmid: 19878931.
- Sato RL, Li GG, Shaha S. Antepartum seafood consumption and mercury levels in newborn cord blood. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 1683-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.005 pmid: 16635458.
- Tsuchiya A, Hinners TA, Krogstad F, White JW, Burbacher TM, Faustman EM, et al., et al. Longitudinal mercury monitoring within the Japanese and Korean communities (United States): implications for exposure determination and public health protection. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 117: 1760-6 pmid: 20049129.
- Gundacker C, Komarnicki G, Zödl B, Forster C, Schuster E, Wittmann K. Whole blood mercury and selenium concentrations in a selected Austrian population: does gender matter? Sci Total Environ 2006; 372: 76-86 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.08.006 pmid: 16963109.
- Rudge CVC, Calderon IMP, Rudge MVC, Volpato G, Silva JLP, Duarte G, et al., et al. Toxic and essential elements in blood from delivering women in selected areas of São Paulo State, Brazil. J Environ Monit 2011; 13: 563-71 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0em00570c pmid: 21184002.
- Rhainds M, Levallois P, Dewailly E, Ayotte P. Lead, mercury, and organochlorine compound levels in cord blood in Québec, Canada. Arch Environ Health 1999; 54: 40-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00039899909602235 pmid: 10025415.
- Puklová V, Krsková A, Cerná M, Cejchanová M, Rehůrková I, Ruprich J, et al., et al. The mercury burden of the Czech population: An integrated approach. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2010; 213: 243-51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.02.002 pmid: 20417154.
- Cerná M, Krsková A, Cejchanová M, Spěváčková V. Human biomonitoring in the Czech Republic: an overview. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2012; 215: 109-19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2011.09.007 pmid: 22014893.
- Huel G, Sahuquillo J, Debotte G, Oury J-F, Takser L. Hair mercury negatively correlates with calcium pump activity in human term newborns and their mothers at delivery. Environ Health Perspect 2008; 116: 263-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10381 pmid: 18288328.
- Anwar M, Ando T, Maaz A, Ghani S, Munir M, Qureshi IU, et al., et al. Scalp hair mercury concentrations in Pakistan. Environ Sci 2007; 14: 167-75 pmid: 17762840.
- Jędrychowski W, Perera F, Rauh V, Flak E, Mróz E, Pac A, et al., et al. Fish intake during pregnancy and mercury level in cord and maternal blood at delivery: an environmental study in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007; 20: 31-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10001-007-0002-8 pmid: 17708016.
- Al-Saleh I, Shinwari N, Mashhour A, Mohamed Gel-D, Ghosh MA, Shammasi Z, et al., et al. Cadmium and mercury levels in Saudi women and its possible relationship with hypertension Biol Trace Elem Res 2006; 112: 13-30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/BTER:112:1:13.
- Al-Saleh I, Coskun S, Mashhour A, Shinwari N, El-Doush I, Billedo G, et al., et al. Exposure to heavy metals (lead, cadmium and mercury) and its effect on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2008; 211: 560-79 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.09.005 pmid: 18160343.
- Al-Saleh I, Shinwari N, Mashhour A, Mohamed GelD, Rabah A. Heavy metals (lead, cadmium and mercury) in maternal, cord blood and placenta of healthy women. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2011; 214: 79-101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.10.001 pmid: 21093366.
- Al-Saleh I, Abduljabbar M, Al-Rouqi R, Elkhatib R, Alshabbaheen A, Shinwari N. Mercury (Hg) exposure in breast-fed infants and their mothers and the evidence of oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013; 153: 145-54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-013-9687-7 pmid: 23661328.
- Miklavčič A, Cuderman P, Mazej D, Snoj Tratnik J, Krsnik M, Planinšek P, et al., et al. Biomarkers of low-level mercury exposure through fish consumption in pregnant and lactating Slovenian women. Environ Res 2011; 111: 1201-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.07.006 pmid: 21835399.
- Díez S, Delgado S, Aguilera I, Astray J, Pérez-Gómez B, Torrent M, et al., et al. Prenatal and early childhood exposure to mercury and methylmercury in Spain, a high-fish-consumer country. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2009; 56: 615-22 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9213-7 pmid: 18836676.
- Díez S, Esbrí JM, Tobias A, Higueras P, Martínez-Coronado A. Determinants of exposure to mercury in hair from inhabitants of the largest mercury mine in the world. Chemosphere 2011; 84: 571-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.065 pmid: 21524785.
- Bjermo H, Sand S, Nälsén C, Lundh T, Enghardt Barbieri H, Pearson M, et al., et al. Lead, mercury, and cadmium in blood and their relation to diet among Swedish adults. Food Chem Toxicol 2013; 57: 161-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.03.024 pmid: 23537601.
- Knobeloch L, Anderson HA, Imm P, Peters D, Smith A. Fish consumption, advisory awareness, and hair mercury levels among women of childbearing age. Environ Res 2005; 97: 220-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.07.001 pmid: 15533338.
- Xue F, Holzman C, Rahbar MH, Trosko K, Fischer L. Maternal fish consumption, mercury levels, and risk of preterm delivery. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 42-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9329 pmid: 17366817.
- Pollack AZ, Schisterman EF, Goldman LR, Mumford SL, Albert PS, Jones RL, et al., et al. Cadmium, lead, and mercury in relation to reproductive hormones and anovulation in premenopausal women. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 1156-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003284 pmid: 21543284.
- Pollack AZ, Schisterman EF, Goldman LR, Mumford SL, Perkins NJ, Bloom MS, et al., et al. Relation of blood cadmium, lead, and mercury levels to biomarkers of lipid peroxidation in premenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 2012; 175: 645-52 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr375 pmid: 22302120.
- Brune D, Nordberg GF, Vesterberg O, Gerhardsson L, Wester PO. A review of normal concentrations of mercury in human blood. Sci Total Environ 1991; 100: 235-82 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(91)90380-W pmid: 2063184.
- Sioen I, De Henauw S, Van Camp J, Volatier J-L, Leblanc J-C. Comparison of the nutritional-toxicological conflict related to seafood consumption in different regions worldwide. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2009; 55: 219-28 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.07.003 pmid: 19589366.
- Bellanger M, Pichery C, Aerts D, Berglund M, Castaño A, Cejchanová M, et al., DEMO/COPHES, et al. Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention. Environ Health 2013; 12: 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-3 pmid: 23289875.
- Stern AH, Smith AE. An assessment of the cord blood:maternal blood methylmercury ratio: implications for risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111: 1465-70 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6187 pmid: 12948885.
- Dye BA, Schober SE, Dillon CF, Jones RL, Fryar C, McDowell M, et al., et al. Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16–49 years: United States, 1999–2000. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62: 368-75 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.016832 pmid: 15901883.
- Axelrad DA, Bellinger DC, Ryan LM, Woodruff TJ. Dose-response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 609-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9303 pmid: 17450232.
- Griffiths C, McGartland A, Miller M. A comparison of the monetized impact of IQ decrements from mercury emissions. Environ Health Perspect 2007; 115: 841-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9797 pmid: 17589589.
- Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schechter C. Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 590-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7743 pmid: 15866768.
- Poulin J, Gibb H. Mercury: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels (Environmental burden of disease series no. 16). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
- Yokoo EM, Valente JG, Grattan L, Schmidt SL, Platt I, Silbergeld EK. Low level methylmercury exposure affects neuropsychological function in adults. Environ Health 2003; 2: 8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-2-8 pmid: 12844364.
- Alloway TP. Working memory and executive function profiles of individuals with borderline intellectual functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res 2010; 54: 448-56 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01281.x pmid: 20537050.
- Fewtrell L, Kaufmann R, Pruss-Ustun A. Lead: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local levels (Environmental burden of disease series no. 2). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
- Roman HA, Walsh TL, Coull BA, Dewailly É, Guallar E, Hattis D, et al., et al. Evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of methylmercury exposures: current evidence supports development of a dose-response function for regulatory benefits analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 607-14 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1003012 pmid: 21220222.
- Mercury use in artisanal and small scale gold mining (module 3). Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme; 2008. Available from: http://www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/awareness_raising_package/E_01-16_BD.pdf [accessed 13 October 2013].
- Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wu Y. Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050. Environ Sci Technol 2009; 43: 2983-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es802474j pmid: 19475981.
- Sunderland EM, Selin NE. Future trends in environmental mercury concentrations: implications for prevention strategies. Environ Health 2013; 12: 2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-2 pmid: 23289850.
- Draft Minamata Convention on Mercury. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme; 2013. Available from: http://www.unep.org/hazardoussubstances/Portals/9/Mercury/Documents/INC5/INC5_7asterisk_final%20report_26%2008_e.pdf [accessed 9 December 2013].