health systems performance homepage

Home ] Up ] List of debates ] Overall framework ] Current work ] Level of health ] Health inequality ] Responsiveness ] [ Fairness in financial contribution ] Efficiency/Attainment ] Functions of health systems ] Glossary ]

WHO home

 

 

Fairness in financial contribution

These documents are organized alphabetically, though responses are grouped with the original document. Recent publications are marked new.gif (160 bytes). For the complete list of debates, by topic, click here.

Many of these documents are in .pdf format. If you do not have the required Adobe Acrobat Reader you can download it here.

If there are documents missing from this list that you believe should be included, please email the site administrator.

To aid your understanding, please refer to the glossary of terms related to health systems performance.

 

To learn more about the WHO technical consultation on fairness in financial contribution, click here.

For more information on WHO's current work on fairness in financial contribution, click here.

 

Document title

Availability

Ammar W and Kasperian R. What is fair in financing fairness? Lebanese Medical Journal, 2001, 49(3).
  • not yet available
Ginter E. World Health Report 2000: the position of Slovak Republic. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy, 2000, 101(9):477-83.

Reproduced with permission from the journal. © Bratislavske Lekarske Listy

Klavus J. Statistical Inference of Progressivity Dominance: An Application to Health Care Financing Distributions. Journal of Health Economics, 2001, 20(3):363-77.

Abstract: This paper employs a distribution-free statistical test suitable for comparisons based on dependent samples to analyse changes in health care financing distributions on Finnish data. In distinction to the more general summary index approach used in most studies of progressivity measurement, the difference between the Lorenz curve of income inequality and the concentration curves of various taxes and payments is used to evaluate progressivity dominance and changes in progressivity. Sample weights are applied to account for the effect of sampling design and non-response. The analysis demonstrates that the dominance approach can be successfully applied to various types of distributional problems besides comparisons concerning differences in income distributions. As an empirical application the paper presents estimation results for the progressivity of various health care financing sources using data from the 1987 and 1996 Finnish Health Care Surveys.

Abstract reprinted from Journal of Health Economics, 20, Klavus J, Statistical Inference of Progressivity Dominance: An Application to Health Care Financing Distributions, 363-77, 2001, with permission from Elsevier Science.

Journal of Health Economics webpage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jhealeco

  • abstract
Oswaldo Cruz Foundation and The Brazilian Ministry of Health. Report of the workshop "Health Systems Performance: The World Health Report 2000", Rio de Janiero, 14-15 December 2000.

Reproduced with permission.

new.gif (160 bytes)Shaw RP. World Health Report 2000 "financial fairness indicator": Useful compass or crystal ball? International Journal of Health Services, 2002, 32(1):195-203.
  • not yet available
new.gif (160 bytes)Wagstaff A. Reflections on and alternatives to WHO's fairness of financial contribution index. Health Economics, 2002, 11:103-115.
  • not yet available
Wagstaff A. Measuring Equity in Health Care Financing: Reflections on and Alternatives to the World Health Organization's Fairness of Financing Index. 4-5-2001. Development Research Group and Human Development Network, World Bank.
Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E, van der BH, Calonge S, Christiansen T, Citoni G et al. Equity in the finance of health care: some further international comparisons. Journal of Health Economics, 1999, 18(3):263-90.

Abstract: This paper presents further international comparisons of progressivity of health care financing systems. The paper builds on the work of Wagstaff et al. [Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer E., et al., 1992. Equity in the finance of health care: some international comparisons, Journal of Health Economics 11, pp. 361--387] but extends it in a number of directions: we modify the methodology used there and achieve a higher degree of cross-country comparability in variable definitions; we update and extend the cross-section of countries; and we present evidence on trends in financing mixes and progressivity.

Abstract reprinted from Journal of Health Economics, 18, Wagstaff A et. al., Equity in the finance of health care: some further international comparisons, 263-90, 1999, with permission from Elsevier Science.

Journal of Health Economics webpage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jhealeco; the full text of this article is available at this site.

  • abstract
World Health Organization. The methods and data used in the World Health Report 2000: A response to the commentary made by the Brazilian delegation to the Executive Board, 17 and 19 January 2001. (This is also a response to the report listed above from the Rio de Janeiro conference on the WHR2000.)

GPE discussion papers. For a complete list, click here.

Murray CJL, Knaul F, Musgrove P, Xu K, Kawabata K. Defining and measuring fairness in financial contribution to the health system. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper Series: No. 24. World Health Organization.

 

Copyright © 2001, World Health Organization

WHO /  Evidence for Health Policy

email the site administrator