The Executive Board,
Having analysed The
world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance, published on 24 June
2000, which included a health system performance index and an overall attainment index as
exercises comparing the performance of the health systems of WHO's 191 Member States;
Taking note of the report on assessment of health
systems' performance1 and of the report by the Chairman of the Executive
Board;2
Considering the importance of health in the development
and well-being of populations;
Bearing in mind the importance of health systems in
improving health conditions and the quality of life;
Recognizing the important role of evaluation of the
performance of national health systems in improving quality, equity, and other criteria
relevant to these systems;
Appreciating the potential for such evaluations to
raise awareness of the needs of health systems and the main policy issues faced, and to
help seek additional resources for health;
Aware that such evaluation exercises should be based on
science and evidence and be as participatory as possible, seeking inputs from all Member
States;
Bearing in mind the resolution of the United Nations
Economic and Social Council entitled "Basic indicators for the integrated and
coordinated implementation of and follow-up to major United Nations conferences and
summits at all levels", dated 28 August 2000, which emphasized that such basic
indicators should be developed with the full participation of all countries and approved
by the relevant intergovernmental bodies; 3
Noting the presentations made by the Secretariat during
the 103rd and 105th sessions of the Executive Board on trends and challenges in world
health; 4
Taking account of resolution CD42.R5, entitled "The
world health report 2000", adopted by the 42nd Directing Council of the Pan
American Health Organization and by the 52nd Session of the Regional Committee of the
Americas on 26 September 2000, and resolution EM/RC47/R.2 of the Regional Committee of the
Eastern Mediterranean Region;
Bearing in mind that the first stage of such
comparative assessment should be a broad agreement on its framework, design and data
sources, that seeks inputs from all Member States;
Taking account of the many methodological
considerations and technical improvements that have already been introduced by Member
States on the framework, design and data sources used in order to compile indexes on the
performance of Member States' health systems published in The world health report
2000: health systems: improving performance;
Aware of the technical difficulties and political
sensitivities associated with comparing the performance of national health systems; and
Recognizing that WHO, within its mandate, has a
historical and important role to play in conducting these evaluations and issuing
recommendations on health policy;
Further recognizing that evaluation of performance of
national health systems has relevance for health systems planners and policy-makers,
|