Enhancing
Health Systems Performance Initiative (EHSPI)
|
Background
Since the publication of the WHR2000, the regional consultations have argued that
the links between the measurement of performance and the development of policy requires
strengthening. In addition, a substantial number of countries expressed interest in active
collaboration with WHO to assess the performance of their own systems and to use the
evidence to formulate policies to improve performance. To meet the country requests, the
Director-General decided to group these efforts under the rubric of the Enhancing
Health Systems Performance Initiative (EHSPI) which we also propose to use to meet
the suggestions of the regional consultations. |
Almost 30 countries* have expressed an
interest, and we are currently working with twenty countries from all income ranges and
all WHO regions. They have expressed a mix of reasons for engaging, including:
- assessment of the performance of their own health systems, or
sub-systems, using the WHO framework;
- assessment of their own performance using better data than was
available to WHO;
- development of national skills in the required methodologies;
- contributing to the development of more practical tools for
translating evidence into practical policy, particularly related to the four functions;
- the search for greater contact with and opportunities for
learning about health systems in other countries.
|
EHSPI - Purpose and Scope
EHSPI has both national and global objectives. At a national level, the aims are
to:
- enable policy makers to have a better understanding of their
health system's performance, and to feed this information into a national debate. This
requires an assessment of performance and the analysis of the policy implications;
- link evidence to actions to improve performance;
- develop greater national capacity to monitor and improve
performance.
|
The country level work interacts with two
global objectives:
- the further development of the conceptual framework and
methods;
- development of a better international evidence-base for policy
advice.
Applying the framework at the country level involves
measuring attainment in terms of the three intrinsic health system goals, assessing how
well the four core health system functions are being carried out, and analysing the policy
implications. These steps can be considered to be part of a diagnostic
phase. The 'implementation' type activities
envisaged by the Initiative refer to specific actions aimed at improving performance would
be carried out and tested, with WHO's assistance where requested. In addition, there
are also 'reflection' type activities in which people involved in different
aspects of performance assessment at the country level can meet together with counterparts
in other countries and with WHO. This allows feedback and further development of the
framework, indicators and methods, as well as to stronger links to policy. |
Implementation: Linking evidence
to policy
A number of participant countries have chosen to hold national seminars to introduce a
wider range of decision-makers, analysts and researchers to the performance assessment
approach, and to discuss preliminary findings from the baseline analysis of inputs,
outcomes and functions. These seminars are an important opportunity to take stock and
synthesize information from a disparate set of actors, and have in some cases led to the
identification of a second set of analytic activities. Follow this link for a list of country seminars. In addition, WHO is providing direct policy support to a
small number of countries, incorporating the information being generated from these
efforts. |
Sub-national Performance
Assessment
Some countries, particularly those with some form of decentralisation,
have suggested that the performance assessment framework used by WHO at the national level
could be helpful in assessing and improving the performance of sub-national units. It
could then become a tool for more effective stewardship and management at the national
level. We are currently discussing ways to develop and test a sub-national assessment tool
with six countries. (For more on subnational performance assessment, see the paper
entitled "Sub-national performance assessment: objectives, challenges, and
strategies" by Travis P, Mechbal A, Murray C, forthcoming on this website). |
Developing Information Systems to
Monitor Performance
Several countries have stated from the start that they want to
link the baseline assessment with longer term efforts to improve their information
systems. This is particularly important if additional indicators of the performance of the
different functions of the system are routinely measured. It would pose additional strains
on health information systems, and makes it all the more important to examine if some of
the required information could be obtained by occasional surveys as a supplement to the
other activities of a health information system. |
Building capacity in health systems
performance assessment and analysis
For health systems performance assessment to be sustainable at the country level,
capacity for undertaking both the diagnostic and implementation phases must be built. A
variety of strategies can be suggested, ranging from straightforward briefings on using
the methods, through technical support to analysts in-country or at WHO, to formal
training workshops. All methods have been piloted - for example, there have been training
workshops in Indonesia and South Africa (in English) for participants from around the
world, in China, and one for French speakers is scheduled for early 2002 in Côte
d'Ivoire. |
| *Australia, Chad, China, Côte d'Ivoire, Czech
Republic, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico,
Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Oman, Papua New Guinea, Senegal, South
Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand, Tunisia, Zimbabwe |
|