Sexual & reproductive health (SRH) and HIV
Research
WHO/Katerini Storneg
- Despite diverse settings and clients, the majority of studies showed improvements in all outcomes measured, and only a few showed mixed results. Many studies reported an increase or improvement in:
- access to and uptake of services, including HIV testing
- health and behavioural outcomes
- condom use
- HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) knowledge
- overall quality of service.
Key research questions
What linkages are currently being evaluated?
What are the outcomes of these linkages?
What types of linkages are most effective and in what context?
What are the current research gaps?
How should policies and programmes be strengthened?
- Linking SRH and HIV was considered beneficial and feasible, especially in family planning clinics, HIV counselling and testing centres, and HIV clinics.
- Of the few studies reporting cost outcomes, all were conducted after 2000. This positive trend may indicate an intent to scale-up linked services.
- Notably, few or no studies addressed the following:
- linked services targeting men and boys
- gender-based violence (GBV) prevention
- stigma and discrimination
- comprehensive SRH services for PLHIV, including addressing unintended pregnancies and planning for safe, desired pregnancies.