Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Kaydos et al. Development and validation... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

A urine-based PCR-ELISA assay may be useful for the detection of T. vaginalis in some clinical research settings where vaginal specimens are not available.

Development and validation of a PCR-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with urine for use in clinical research settings to detect Trichomonas vaginalis in women.
Kaydos SC, Swygard H, Wise SL, Sena AC, Leone PA, Miller WC, Cohen MS, Hobbs MM.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002;40:89-95.
 
Summary:

Question
What is the performance of a urine-based PCR amplification method for the detection of T. vaginalis in women compared to detection in vaginal specimens by conventional wet mount and culture?

Design
This paper describes a cross-sectional, blinded study to directly compare a PCR amplification assay for the detection of T. vaginalis in urine samples from women versus the combined reference standard of wet mount and T. vaginalis culture of vaginal swab specimens.

Participants
Urine specimens were collected from 2,930 women presenting to the sexually transmitted disease clinics of two county health departments in North Carolina. Participants were between 18 and 65 years old, spoke English, and had not used oral or topical metronidazole for four weeks prior to specimen collection. The women were predominantly African-American (81%) and Caucasian (16%). Sixty-five percent were "symptomatic", defined as having a reported or observed abnormal vaginal discharge. The final study population comprised 2,147 women for whom the time and temperature limits for urine storage and transportation were maintained. Of these, 780 (549 from "symptomatic" women and 231 from "asymptomatic" women) had urine samples that were tested by the PCR-ELISA assay and by the reference standard methods.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
From 2 to 100 mL of first-void urine was collected in sterile containers for PCR analysis. The samples were stored at 4oC and transported on ice within three days of collection to the testing laboratory. One mL of urine was processed using the Amplicor CT Urine Specimen Prep kit (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Indianapolis, IN), and an aliquot was added to the T. vaginalis PCR reaction, which contained one primer labeled with digoxigenin. PCR amplicons were detected using a biotinylated probe and the PCR ELISA DIG detection kit (Roche Diagnostic Systems). The limit of detection for this assay was eight T. vaginalis organisms per PCR reaction. Two vaginal swabs were collected for a conventional wet mount microscopy and for a T. vaginalis culture using the InPouch TV culture system (Biomed, San Jose, CA), processed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The reference standard was based on the combined results of wet mount and culture, with a positive sample defined as positive for either wet mount or culture, and a negative sample as negative for both wet mount and culture.

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity and specificity of the PCR-ELISA assay for the detection of T. vaginalis in urine samples compared to the detection in vaginal swabs by the combined wet mount and culture reference standard were determined. The specificity of the PCR-ELISA was then adjusted using a formula that assumed the true sensitivity of the combined reference standard to be 0.70 and the true specificity of the standard to be 1.0 (Staquet M., et al., J. Chron. Dis., 1981;34:599-610).

Main Results
The performance of the PCR-ELISA compared to the reference standard is shown in the table. The test performed with equivalent sensitivity and specificity in patients with or without symptoms or signs of abnormal vaginal discharge, a history of douching, or the presence of chlamydial infection, gonorrhea, or bacterial vaginosis. The assay was slightly more sensitive with urine specimens with smaller volumes (<20 ml) and when more than 1.5 h had elapsed since the previous void.

T. vaginalis PCR-ELISA performance compared to combined wet mount and culture.
Subject group n % Sensitivity
(95% CI)
% Specificity
(95% CI)
% Adjusted specificity
Asymptomatic 231 89.5 (66.5, 98.2) 83.5 (73.9, 90.2) 90.7
Symptomatic 549 91.8 (84.1, 96.2) 87.2 (83.6-90.0) 95.3
Overall 780 90.8 (84.2, 95.0) 86.1 (83.2, 88.7) 93.4

Authors' Conclusions
PCR combined with ELISA for detection of T. vaginalis in women's urine performed well compared to wet mount microscopy and culture from vaginal swabs. The T. vaginalis PCR-ELISA on urine samples should be useful for the detection of this organism in settings where collection of vaginal specimens for microscopy and culture is not practical.

Source of funding: NIH Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Trails Unit, NIH Sexually Transmitted Diseases Cooperative Research Centers, and NIH National Study of Adolescent Health: Survey 2000.

For correspondence: Marcia Hobbs, Department of Medicine, Campus Box 7030, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. E-mail address: mmhobbs@med.unc.edu.

expert review

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001