Literature reviews  >  Articles for review > Pillay et al. Evaluation of Xenostrip-Tv ... 

 

About SDI
Mission
Diagnostic
Priorities
Workplan
Activities
Newsletters
Grants
Publications
Journal articles
Guidelines
Manuals
Reports
Literature reviews
Contact us

The Xenostrip-Tv test is rapid, easy to perform, and more sensitive than wet mount for the detection of T. vaginalis in vaginal swab specimens.

Evaluation of Xenostrip-Tv, a rapid diagnostic test for Trichomonas vaginalis infection.
Pillay A, Lewis J, Ballard RC.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42:3853-56.

 

Summary:

Question
What is the performance of a rapid, immunochromatographic strip test compared to wet mount and PCR for the detection of T. vaginalis in vaginal swab specimens?

Design
The performance of an immunochromatographic strip test, Xenostrip-Tv, was compared to wet mount and PCR for the diagnosis of T. vaginalis in vaginal swabs collected from women presenting with genital tract complaints at adult health centers.

Participants
Four hundred twenty-eight consecutive women presenting to three adult health centers in Atlanta, GA, with genital tract complaints requiring a speculum examination were tested.

Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard
Vaginal swabs were collected during a speculum examination, placed into saline, and sent to the on-site laboratory. A wet preparation was performed with fluid expressed from the swab by placing a drop onto a glass slide and examining it under the microscope for motile trichomonads within 20 min of specimen collection. The residual specimen volume was aliquoted and stored at 4oC. The Xenostrip-Tv test (Xenotope Diagnostics, San Antonio, TX) was performed within 24 h by adding sample buffer to the specimen, placing the absorbent end of the nitrocellulose membrane test strip into the tube, and reading the results at 10 min. If T. vaginalis was present, a complex consisting of T. vaginalis antigens and mouse antibodies that were conjugated to red particles on the strip was formed. A secondary anti-mouse capture antibody bound the complex, forming a red line. A second capture line served as a positive control to monitor assay performance. If no red line appeared or background color made reading impossible, the results were considered invalid. DNA was extracted from specimens using the QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer‚s instructions. PCR amplification was performed using primers TVK3 and TVK7, which amplify a 261 bp sequence of a T. vaginalis repeat DNA fragment. Specimens positive by the PCR assay and negative by either the Xenostrip-Tv test or the wet preparation were tested with a confirmatory PCR amplification performed using primers TVA5-1 and TVA6, which amplify a 98 bp fragment. The forward primers for both PCR assays were labeled at the 5‚ ends with fluorescein phosphoramidite so that amplicon size could be determined on an ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems).

Main Outcome Measures
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Xenostrip-Tv test, wet mount, and PCR for the detection of T. vaginalis in vaginal swab specimens were determined compared to an expanded gold standard defined as a positive wet mount and PCR test with primers TVK3 and TVK7 and/or a positive PCR test confirmed by a second PCR with primers TVA5-1 and TVA6.

Main Results
T. vaginalis was detected in 26 (6.1%), 36 (8.4%), and 57 (13.3%) of 428 specimens by wet mount, Xenostrip-Tv, and PCR, respectively. Fifty-four of 57 specimens that were positive by PCR were confirmed by the second PCR. The DNA was re-extracted from the 3 discordant specimens and was T. vaginalis positive when retested by the PCR using primers TVK3 and TVK7. The prevalence of T. vaginalis was 12.6% (54 of 428) based on the expanded gold standard. The performances of wet mount, Xenostrip-Tv, and PCR compared to the expanded gold standard are shown in the table. Compared to wet mount, the Xenostrip-Tv assay detected 10 additional positive specimens (P < 0.001).

Performance of wet mount, Xenosrtip-Tv, and PCR for the detection of T. vaginalis in 428 vaginal swabs as determined using an expanded gold standard

Assay

Performance (%)

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Wet mount

48.2

100

100

93

Xenostrip-Tv

66.7

100

100

95.4

PCR

100

99.2

94.7

100

Authors‚ Conclusions
The Xenostrip-Tv test was significantly more sensitive than the wet mount preparation and did not detect any false positive results. This assay is reliable and easy to perform, does not require sophisticated equipment, can be performed on site by laboratory personnel, nurses, and medical practitioners with minimal training, and provides results within 10 min. It may be most useful in settings where a rapid point-of-care test is needed or where microscopy and culture are impractical.

Source of funding: Xenotope Diagnostics, San Antonio, TX, provided test kits

For correspondence: A. Pillay, Sexually Transmitted Infections Branch, Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., MS-G39, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail address: apillay@cdc.gov.

   

about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews

WHO Home - WHO Search - TDR Home - SDI Home - SDI Contact us
(c) WHO/OMS 2001