|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Literature reviews > Articles for review > Baseman et al. M. genitalium antibodies or DNA were detected ... |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
M. genitalium antibodies or DNA were detected in less than two-thirds of specimens from M. genitalium culture-positive women. Diagnostic assessment of Mycoplasma
genitalium in culture-positive women. Question Design Participants Description of Tests and Diagnostic Standard Cervical and vaginal swab specimens stored at –80oC were thawed, centrifuged, the pellets suspended in water, and incubated on ice for 20 min. The samples were centrifuged again, the pellets suspended in water, and boiled for 15 min. Samples were amplified using primers Mg1 and Mg2 that targeted the M. genitalium P140 adhesin gene. M. genitalium specific amplicons were identified by Southern blot analysis using P32-labeled probe MG-1. Serum samples were tested for M. genitalium antibodies using an ELISA assay and an immunoblot. For the ELISA, lipid-associated membrane proteins (LAMP) from M. genitalium were extracted, diluted, and added to each well of microtiter plates, which were blocked with horse serum. The patients’ serum samples were added to duplicate wells and incubated for 2 h. Goat anti-human IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and a colorimetric substrate were added. The cut-off for the assay (0.28) was determined by calculating the mean of the optical densities (OD) at 405 nm for the negative control sera plus 3 standard deviations. For the immunoblot, LAMP was separated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Diluted serum samples were added to antigen-containing strips and incubated for 2 h. Goat anti-human IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and a colorimetric substrate were added. Results were scored as negative, 1+, 2+, and 3+. Main Outcome Measures Main Results By the ELISA assay, 52 (96.3%) of the 54 control sera had ODs below the cutoff, while 16 (51.6%) of the 31 sera collected at time of culture from M. genitalium culture-positive women had ODs above the cutoff. Twenty-five (80.6%) of the culture-positive women seroconverted during the course of the study. Of 29 women with sufficient serum samples to evaluate, 13%, 32%, and 26% exhibited peak seroconversion prior to, at the time of, and after positive culture, respectively. All 31 women at the time of positive M. genitalium culture exhibited positive immunoblots. The two negative control sera with positive ELISA results were also positive by immunoblot. Twelve (38.7%) of 31 women were M. genitalium PCR positive at time of culture. Twenty-five (80.6%) women were PCR positive for at least one sample during the course of the study. Among women positive by PCR, 75% were ELISA positive at the time of culture, and 84% were ELISA positive during the study period. Twelve (38.7%) women were PCR and ELISA negative at the time of culture. Two of the 6 women who remained PCR negative throughout the study also remained negative by the ELISA assay. The number of women with each immunoblot score, the ELISA OD median and range, and the number of PCR positive women with each score are shown in the table. Results of ELISA assay for M. genitalium antibodies and PCR for M. genitalium DNA among 31 M. genitalium culture positive women by immunoblot score at time of culture.
Authors’ Conclusions Source of funding: Grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease For correspondence: Joel B. Baseman, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Carl Dr., MC 7758, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900. E-mail address: baseman@uthscsa.edu. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
about SDI | newsletters | grants | publications | literature reviews WHO
Home -
WHO
Search - TDR Home - SDI Home -
SDI Contact us
|
|||||||||||||||||||