The world health report

Chapter 3


Bibliography

  • Kates RW, Kasperson JX. Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards: a review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1983; 80:7027-38.
  • Royal Society. Risk analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society; 1992.
  • Carter S. Boundaries of danger and uncertainty: an analysis of the technological culture of risk assessment. In: Gabe J, editor. Medicine, health and risk: sociological approaches. Oxford: Blackwell; 1995. Chapter 7, p. 133-50.
  • Slovic P. The perception of risk. London: Earthscan; 2000.
  • Gifford S. The meaning of lumps: a case study of the ambiguities of risk. Stall R, Janes C, Gifford S, editors. Anthropology and epidemiology. Interdisciplinary approaches to the study of health and disease. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing; 1986.
  • Pidgeon N. Risk perception. Risk analysis, perception and management 1992;
  • National Research, Committee on. Stern PC, Fineberg HV, editors. Understanding risk. Informing decisions in a democratic society 1996;
  • Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Los Angeles and London: University of California Press; 1982.
  • Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987; 236: 280-85.
  • Saloojee Y, Dagli E. Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2000; 78: 902-10.
  • Fischhoff B. Managing risk perception. Issues in Science and Technology 1985; 2: 83-96.
  • Slovic P. Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis 1986; 6: 403-15.
  • Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 1969; 165: 1232-8.
  • Slovic P. Understanding perceived risk. The World Health Report 2002
  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, editors. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
  • Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Layman M, Combs B. Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1978; 4: 551-78.
  • Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Derby SL, Keeney RL. Acceptable risk. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. Schwing RC, Albers WA, editors. Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough?. New York: Plenum; 1980.
  • Fischhoff B, Watson S, Hope C. Defining risk. Policy Sciences 1984; 17: 123-39.
  • Pantelides EA. Convergence and divergence: reproduction-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviour among young urban men in four Latin American cities. 2001 (unpublished paper).
  • Crouch EAC, Wilson R. Risk-benefit analysis. Cambridge (MA): Ballinger; 1982.
  • Barke R, Jenkins-Smith H, Slovic P. Risk perceptions of men and women scientists. Social Science Quarterly 1997; 78: 167-76.
  • Slovic P, Malmfors T, Mertz CK, Neil N, Purchase IF. Evaluating chemical risks: results of a survey of the British Toxicology Society. Human and Experimental Toxicology 1997; 16: 289-304.
  • Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 1994; 14: 1101-8.
  • Dake K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1991; 22: 61-82.
  • Peters E, Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996; 26: 1427-53.
  • Jasper JM. Nuclear politics: energy and the state in the United States, Sweden and France. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1990.
  • Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: 20 years of experience. Risk Analysis 1995; 15: 137-45.
  • McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine 1982; 306: 1259-62.
  • Nelkin D. Communicating technological risk: the social construction of risk perception. Annual Review of Public Health 1989; 10: 95-113.
  • Ogden J. Psychosocial theory and the creation of the risky self. Social Science and Medicine 1995; 40:409-15.
  • Douglas M Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London and New York: Routledge; 1992.
  • Davison C, Davey Smith, Frankel S. Lay epidemiology and the prevention paradox. Sociology of Health and Illness 1991; 13: 1-19.
  • Sommerfeld J, Sanon M, Kouyate BA, Sauerborn R. Perceptions of risk, vulnerability and disease prevention in rural Burkina Faso: implications for community-based health care and insurance. Human Organization 2002:in press.
  • Manderson L. Reducing health risks in resource-poor settings: The relevance of an anthropological perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Unpublished background paper for The World Health Report 2002.
  • Manderson L, Tye LC. Condom use in heterosexual sex: a review of research, 1985-1994. Sherr L, Catalan J, Hedge B, editors. The impact of AIDS: psychological and social aspects of HIV infection. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Press; 1997.
  • Pelto PJ, Pelto GH. Studying knowledge, culture and behaviour in applied medical anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1997; 11: 147-63.
  • Renn O. The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk Decision and Policy 1998; 3: 5-30.
  • Plough A, Krimsky S. The emergence of risk communication studies: social and political context. Science, Technology and Human Values 1987; 12: 4-10.
  • Phillips, Lord, Bridgeman J, Fergusan-Smith M. The Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Inquiry (the Phillips Inquiry): findings and conclusions (Volume 1). London: The Stationery Office; 2000.
  • Krimsky S, Golding D, editors. Societal theories of risk.. New York: Praeger; 1992.
  • Ong EK, Glantz AG. Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers and public relations firms. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91: 1749-57.
  • Bero L. The role of special interest groups in influencing data on risk. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Unpublished background paper for The World Health Report 2002.
  • Jasanoff S. Science and Engineering Ethics. 1996; 2:263-76.
  • Jasanoff S. Science at the Bar: law, science and technology in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1995. p. 69-92.
  • Yach D, Bialous SA. Junking science to promote tobacco. American Journal of Public Health 2001; 91:1745-8.
  • Nelkin D. AIDS and the news media. The Milbank Quarterly 1991; 69: 293-307.