[OUTCOME]

Financial, human, and administrative resources managed in an efficient, effective, results-oriented and transparent manner

Improving the Organization’s management and administration is key to improving efficiency and delivering value for money and will also bolster implementation of technical programmes and the ability to respond to health emergencies.

The COVID-19 pandemic placed WHO under tremendous pressure from multiple directions, as it was at the centre of the global response. Because of the speed and scale of the work required, financial management processes and human resources were put to the test, with reorganization of staff functions to respond to new challenges, in addition to ensuring the business continuity of WHO operations.

The Secretariat was able to adapt effectively and respond to countries’ needs promptly, performing adequately and more broadly through effective adoption of new technologies, workplace safety protocols and efforts to maintain business continuity, including by leveraging business processes. Thus, although pandemic-related issues were the primary challenge, they lead to significant achievements.

The Secretariat mobilized resources to strengthen teamwork, leadership and coordination to respond to increased requests for support, which was critical for business continuity. Workplace practices were shifted to hybrid and remote working methods, which enabled WHO to preserve the health of its staff and continue to ensure programmatic support to Member States. Several infrastructural changes were made to allow staff to work remotely, such as acquiring logistical and technical equipment and modifying working environments to enable physical distancing, despite disruptions to global supply chains.

To mitigate the risk of disruption of the organizational supply chain, the supply chain strategy was finalized, covering and integrating all elements of an end-to-end supply chain (planning, sourcing, stock management, warehousing, logistics), including for emergency situations.

At the three levels of the Organization, initiatives such as the Global Assurance Hub increased transparency and oversight of WHO grants. This and other initiatives proved invaluable in the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic by contributing to direct, transparent, reliable financial cooperation between Member States and WHO. Improved virtual platforms also enhanced the cost–effectiveness of support services. Review processes and continuity plans helped the Secretariat to achieve substantial value for money and accountability.

Nevertheless, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed areas for improvement in human resources, service delivery and asset procurement. In addition, the pandemic was a source of strain for staff and led to discussions on fundamental issues in the workplace and staff well-being. This triggered consideration of more flexible working arrangements and adaptation of the Organization’s human resources policy to the “new normal” and to ensure a respectful workplace open to all.

As the Secretariat and Member States interact increasingly on virtual platforms and rely on online tools, the increasing focus on more effective, efficient support should be accompanied by sufficient information technology to respond to increasing cyber-security threats and growing demand for online tools and web-based communication and coordination platforms.

As the technical units continue to adapt to changing needs and contexts, especially for effective responses to emergencies, WHO is committed to creating more flexibility and being more agile in responding and providing support to ensure that every team, department, budget centre and major office can make an impact where it is needed the most.

 

WHO’s response to health emergencies: 2020-2021

WHO'S CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS HEALTH OUTCOMES

WHO's Output Scorecard measures its performance for accountability

The Scorecard below shows the assessment of WHO’s performance in delivering the programme budget outputs agreed with Member States using six different dimensions, i.e., technical support, leadership, global public health goods, value for money, gender, equity, human rights and disability, and achieving results in ways leading to impact. The dimension score (shown as a line) is the aggregate score of the different attributes (shown as sticks). A Scorecard is reported for every output at the global level. In addition, every major office reports its Scorecard for every output.

Select an Output
  • Sound financial practices and oversight managed through an efficient and effective internal control framework
  • Effective and efficient management and development of human resources to attract, recruit and retain talent for successful programme delivery
  • Effective, innovative and secure digital platforms and services aligned with the needs of users, corporate functions, technical programmes and health emergencies operations
  • Safe and secure environment, with efficient infrastructure maintenance, cost-effective support services and responsive supply chain, including duty of care

SCORING SCALE
1 Emergent
2 Developing
3 Satisfactory
4 Strong

View global output leading indicators

Learn more about the Output Scorecard

BUDGET FINANCING AND IMPLEMENTATION

Overview

    358.90 MILLION US$ Approved programme budget
    378.74 MILLION US$ Available funds
    365.06 MILLION US$ Implementation

Within Programme budget 2020-2021, the budget was approved by the World Health Assembly by outcome. Prioritization of work by the countries was also carried out by outcome, as was the development of the bottom-up budget. The result is a strong association between the highest prioritized outcomes and their budget levels – for example the outcomes prioritized as high by country offices were allocated 87% of the budget and 86% of the available funding for country offices.

At the end of the biennium, the overall average financing of the 12 programme budget outcomes was 88% with 3 outcomes funded over 100% and 3 outcomes having less than 75% financing (see Budget section). Disaggregation of financing to the level of outcome and major office shows a number of outcomes with significant underfunding as biennium closed and highlights the chronic lack of sustainable financing to reduce funding gaps. It also underlines the importance of flexible resources, which are key to reduce chronic gaps in certain areas of work. As reiterated within the Sustainable Financing Working group discussions, as long as flexible and thematic funds remain the lesser proportion of resources available, improving allocation of resources can only be successful to a very limited extent.

Additional details for key figures on budget, financing and implementation for the outcome, presented by organizational level (Countries, Regions, Headquarters), contributors, type of expenses and much more can be seen by following the below link.

 

THE GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH GOODS PRODUCED BY WHO

See the list of Global Public Health Goods guiding polices, decisions and operations to drive impact


Select output to view the list

title
content

STORIES OF WHO'S IMPACT

Selection of stories that exemplify how WHO is achieving impacts where it matters most.