Communicating risk in public health emergencies

In public health emergencies, one essential lifesaving action is risk communication. People have a right to know how to protect their health and have a responsibility to take informed decisions to protect themselves, their loved ones and those around them. Effective risk communication not only saves lives and reduces illness, it enables countries and communities to preserve their social, economic and political stability in the face of emergencies.

Risk communication is one of 8 core capacities in order to prevent the global spread of disease as required under the International Health Regulations (2005). Risk communication is also a component of global and country preparedness for an influenza pandemic, as part of the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework.

WHO provides global guidance to countries on the best practices for risk communication. The Organization also supports countries to build capacity through:

  • establishing policies, strategies and plans for risk communication;
  • providing training for key personnel;
  • engaging and training journalists on how to report on health emergencies; and
  • running simulation exercises to test national systems.

Additionally, WHO provides hands on support in emergency response by deploying its Emergency Communications Network to affected countries and regions to work hand-in-hand with national and local authorities.

Our work

Publications

Communicating risk in public health emergencies: a WHO guideline for emergency risk communication (‎ERC)‎ policy and practice

Overview

Recent public health emergencies, such as the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa (2014–2015), the emergence of the Zika virus syndrome in 2015–2016 and multi-country yellow fever outbreaks in Africa in 2016, have highlighted major challenges and gaps in how risk is communicated during epidemics and other health emergencies.

The challenges include the rapid transformation in communications technology, including the near-universal penetration of mobile telephones, the widespread use and increasingly powerful influence of digital media which has had an impact on ‘traditional’ media (newspapers, radio and television), and major changes in how people access and trust health information.

Important gaps include considerations of context – the social, economic, political and cultural factors influencing people’s perception of risk and their risk-reduction behaviours. Finally, guidance is needed on the best approaches for strengthening emergency risk communication (ERC) capacity and sustaining them for potential health emergencies.

The recommendations in these guidelines provide overarching, evidence-based guidance on how risk communication should be practised in an emergency. The recommendations also guide countries on building capacity for communicating risk during health emergencies.

WHO Team
Emergency Preparedness (WPE), Guidelines Review Committee
Editors
World Health Organization
Number of pages
78
Reference numbers
ISBN: 978-92-4-155020-8
Copyright
OMS sur la communication

Disease outbreaks are inevitable, and often unpredictable, events. The environment surrounding an outbreak is unique in all of public health. Outbreaks...

Communication for behavioural impact (COMBI) - toolkit

This interagency (FAO, UNICEF, WHO) toolkit will be useful for anyone wanting to design effective outbreak prevention and control measures in community...

Outbreak communication: Best practices for communicating with the public during an outbreak

Strategies for health education and social mobilization during outbreaks have been refined in recent years. They are now routinely used by WHO, with support...