6.3. Community-driven participatory co-construction, monitoring, reporting and dissemination of findings

Empowering communities to participate in monitoring and reporting strengthens accountability and transparency. This area emphasizes the co-construction of monitoring frameworks with community stakeholders, ensuring that findings are accessible, relevant and used for advocacy and decision-making.  

Examples from SIMASHE

Community-led accountability and trust in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Community-centred participatory planning was implemented using village-level indicators to ensure data is fed back to the communities, promoting accountability in multisectoral strategies. A locally relevant trust scale was developed and used to measure changes in trust in health services following the intervention, through a village census survey in selected sites. This showed a broad increase, highlighting the importance of trust and relationships in addressing social determinants of health at all levels.

Examples from related work and initiatives

Advancing urban governance through community-led monitoring efforts in Pasig City, the Philippines: Under the WHO initiative for Urban Governance and Well-being, the approach to strengthening urban governance for health and well-being in Pasig City has been grounded in community-led monitoring efforts highlighting the importance of addressing the social determinants of health. These efforts have been supported through partnerships with academic institutions, particularly the University of the Philippines College of Public Health, and by building the capacities of local leaders, youth councils and civil society organizations. By embedding health into local planning, creating inclusive decision-making platforms, and sustaining dialogue across city and barangay (district) levels, Pasig shows the role of community engagement and cross-sector collaboration in driving healthier and more resilient urban environments.

 


Key intervention activities

SIMASHE is continuously seeking examples related to this area of work, including activities for:

  • establishing mechanisms for the collective and iterative gathering, analysis, discussion and use of SDH data with communities.  
  • promoting feedback mechanisms to capture indicators through an intersectional lens in collaboration with communities.
  • transparent and accessible SDH equity reporting, tailored to different government levels, sectors and community members.
  • devising real-time, community-tailored SDH monitoring dissemination tools.
  • promoting stakeholder engagement and feedback loops for permanent local SDH monitoring.
  • using monitoring insights to support local advocacy efforts for policy changes addressing identified inequities.