COVID-19 Social media Q&A - 25 November 2021
Overview
00:01:14
AK Thank
you for joining [?] today's live Q&A on COVID-19 with Dr Mike Ryan and Dr
Maria Van Kerkhove. My name is Aleksandra Kuzmanovic. This week we changed the
schedule a little bit because we have also a special session of the World
Health Assembly next week so we won't be able to have this conversation. But if
you have questions on the current COVID situation please ask the questions
using the hashtag #askWHO if you're watching us on Twitter.
If you're watching us on other platforms please
use the comments section to send your questions. Good afternoon, Maria, Mike.
Thank you for your time. We have a press conference yesterday in which Dr
Tedros expressed his concern over a false sense of security after being
vaccinated and reducing other preventative measures and it's been picked up
quite a lot in media overnight so maybe you can elaborate more on the concern
and the situation in Europe, which he highlighted as being the epicentre of the
transmission at the moment.
MR Yes,
and as Tedros outlined yesterday there are many factors that have driven the
current situation which has emerged in Europe. Obviously in the summertime as
countries began rolling out vaccines, the weather was better many countries
began to roll back restrictions and public health measures on people that were
in some ways affecting people's lives as well and there was an expectation that
vaccination levels would probably get up very, very high.
We didn't fully understand at that time exactly
for how long the vaccine would protect and whether there were going to be any
issues with waning.
00:03:09
But certainly as we've entered into the winter
period and as people have gone back inside and as measures have been almost
completely lifted, even simple measures like masking inside - and it's happened
in that way - what we see is that perfect storm of going back inside, the lack
of personal precautions and that partnership we had between governments and
people to maintain those layered measures, not lock-downs but that ability to
continue doing some of the activities that reduce risk.
Avoiding crowded places, wearing masks inside,
assuring ventilation, trying to reduce individual risks and the government
helping with that. That to a great extent has reduced and on top of that, which
is probably more surprising than anything else, is that while Europe and the
European region has had fantastic access to vaccines there's been a lot of
vaccine hesitancy in many, many countries and especially and most worryingly, I
think, in groups that you would have expected would really have come out and
wanted that vaccine, particularly older persons, persons with underlying conditions.
00:04:21
We've not seen the uptake of the vaccine in some
countries at the same level that would be required to really protect those
populations and what's happened within that is that as the virus has
transmitted amongst younger and otherwise healthy people increasingly we've
seen people who are older and vulnerable being exposed to the virus and then
we're seeing hospitalisations and we're seeing deaths rising.
That's particularly true in central and eastern
Europe, where we see very low rates of vaccination in comparison so there're
two experiences. There're countries who've not achieved high levels of
vaccination and they now are facing into the winter with very few public health
measures in place, with a very vulnerable population and a delta variant that's
spreading very intensely. They're in a very difficult situation.
But in many of the countries further west in
Europe while the vaccination levels are high - and congratulations for what's
been achieved in that - there are also significant numbers of people even in
those older and vulnerable populations who've not been vaccinated.
00:05:26
Because the virus is transmitting quite
efficiently in younger people it's eventually finding those vulnerable people
and putting them in hospital and in some cases killing them. Partially that's -
Maria might explain a bit more - that's been driven by all this intense social
mixing.
We're back to pre-pandemic levels of mixing in
western Europe and you can see that in the data. I think people had that
expectation that once a certain proportion of people were vaccinated everyone
could mix again and nothing could happen.
Unfortunately with the delta variant, with the
fact that while the vaccines are highly protective against hospitalisation and
death and they're quite effective against you becoming infected again but
they're not perfect and they're actually quite effective even if you get
reinfected while vaccinated, you have a lower chance of passing the virus on
but again they're not perfect.
00:06:23
So what happens in this situation is that
previously vaccinated people, while they won't get sick and they don't transmit
as easily as potentially people who haven't been previously vaccinated, they do
participate in that cycle of transmission.
If the virus is around in large enough numbers
and if enough people are being exposed all the time eventually that number of
people builds up and then it's almost like a wave of a certain height won't
crash on the shore but sometimes the waves build up and eventually they overwhelm
the defences and that's really what's happening.
It's almost as if we've sleep-walked our way
into this situation where the virus has now gained an upper hand again and
that's to an extent because governments and individuals have really let down
their guard and I don't mean that... because we're all two years into this and
we're all exhausted with all of this.
But that's the reality and that's what the DG
was trying to get across yesterday, not to say vaccines don't... Vaccines are
working remarkably well but what he was saying was, yes, get vaccinated and get
fully vaccinated but just also be cautious once you're vaccinated that you
don't become part of a transmission chain again, that you don't contribute to
transmission again.
00:07:41
Because while the vaccines will protect you
against being hospitalised and dying they won't perfectly protect you against
becoming infected or infecting someone else so therefore to maintain those at
least small precautions so that you don't become part of the transmission
chain.
I've probably spent too long explaining that but
I think it's important to get across what the DG was saying yesterday. Maria.
MK I
totally agree. I think this idea that you're completely safe once you're
vaccinated... I think we all want that but the vaccines aren't perfect at
everything. They're incredibly effective at preventing severe disease and death
and they are very positive in terms of preventing infection and onward
transmission but they don't prevent all infections and they don't prevent all
transmissions.
That's why it's really important that you as
individuals, leaders when they're setting policies, they also have measures in
place that reduce transmission. So it's increasing vaccination coverage but
critically focusing on the people that need those vaccines most.
00:08:42
It's not just about 40% of a population. It's
the right 40% in that country, the right 70% in that country and what we mean
by that is focusing on people who are at risk of developing severe disease first
in all countries.
That's what's really, really important so we've
been trying to speak a little bit more about not just who is vaccinated but
who's missed by vaccination because that's where we will see the success in
this.
But it isn't vaccines alone and I think that's
also this false sense of security that if you just get to a certain percentage
of vaccination the pandemic will be over and I'm afraid that's not where we're
at. We need to get vaccination coverage up to the right individuals but we also
need to drive transmission down.
That's because we have the possibility that the
virus will evolve. It is evolving and this has been happening since the
beginning. We have the risk of future emergence of new variants and we have to
do everything that we can.
In most parts of the world it is quite simple
now to wear a well-fitting mask, to clean your hands, to keep your distance
from others. It doesn't mean lock-down and I think we will continue to say that
every single time we say public health and social measures.
It's a combination of measures, of distancing
and even in the buildings where we live, where we work, where we study there
needs to be more investment in ventilation, which will not only benefit COVID
but it will benefit other infectious diseases, other contaminants and it's a
layered approach.
But as you put those layers in you have to be
very careful as you peel those layers away. If you take them all up at once the
virus will take advantage of that regardless of how much vaccination is there.
So we're advising to increase vaccine coverage
but also decrease transmission and this is something we can do because we have
tools in our toolbox. Maybe we'll go back to our toolbox analogy. All of us
have tools at hand. Leaders need to provide policies and support to people to
be able to use those tools and so they can get on with their lives.
00:10:45
I think many countries are finding some kind of
a balance for this but unfortunately this surge that we are seeing in Euro
began in June. It's not in recent weeks. It's been steadily increasing for many
weeks now and we're entering our third winter of this pandemic in the northern
hemisphere.
Myself I can't even believe I'm saying that. In
the last week alone there was an 11% increase in Europe, more than 2.4 million
cases from Europe out of the 3.6 million reported globally. That's two-thirds
of all cases and we are seeing not only increasing cases but we're seeing
increasing deaths and this is incredibly tragic because we have tools that can
prevent that.
I just want to make one last point. When we
report cases it's also imperfect because we're not able to say how many of
those cases were vaccinated or how many of those deaths were vaccinated as well
as we would like to, as Mike and I are speaking and rattling off these numbers
right now.
But we do see on an individual country basis
that those who are vaccinated, the proportion of people are hospitalised - more
people are unvaccinated than vaccinated, significantly. So vaccines work,
that's my point, vaccines work even against the delta variant and so when it is
your turn please get vaccinated and make sure you receive that full course.
00:12:16
Whatever you can do, please fight for vaccine
equity around the world so that those who are most at risk in all countries get
their first and second doses.
AK Thank
you, Maria. Maybe we can take a follow-up question from Gopal Sharma because
you mentioned some data from Euro region but also overall and he's asking
what's the present situation regarding COVID so maybe you can also update us on
other regions.
MK Yes,
I can give a go. I'll try to keep it short. We do publish our weekly sitrep
every week and that's where I get most of the information from that we have
here. We did see a decline in cases in south-east Asia, our eastern
Mediterranean region and across Africa but we did see increasing deaths in the
western Pacific, in the Americas, almost a 20% increase in deaths in the
Americas as well as a 3% increase in deaths in Europe.
00:13:10
It's dynamic. We have hot-spots in all regions.
Some countries have brought the virus to a low level and for those countries we
would advise to continue to keep that transmission low, do not let your guard
up so that we can drive that transmission down while you get your vaccine coverage
up.
But it is quite dynamic around the world. Europe
really is a hot-spot right now and it is a warning. The situation in Europe is
similar to the situation we saw last year in Europe. Let's not do this again.
Let's learn from each other.
There was a question, I think, at the press
conference yesterday which I don't know if we actually answered. What can we
learn? I think we should be learning from every country's experience, every
country's response because it's about that combination and getting that balance
right.
But I do want to recognise that while we have
increased testing around the world it's still not strong and in many countries
they've reduced the amount of testing for COVID-19 and we need testing to
continue.
We need strong surveillance not only for
COVID-19 but now for influenza, for RSV, for other respiratory pathogens that
are circulating. We need testing linked to public health action so that people
know what to do.
00:14:33
If you are infected with COVID, what do I do,
how do I get into the clinical care pathway, or if I'm mild or asymptomatic how
do I make sure that if I'm infected I don't pass the virus to others? All of
that public health work, that infrastructure of surveillance, testing, good
clinical care, strong workforce.
That also needs to continue so we are advising
countries to even surge their capacities now even as we enter the third year of
this because it will benefit COVID and all future infectious threats that we
have.
AK Thank
you, Maria. You're now mentioning testing and there is also a question from
Maureen Adams, also watching us on Facebook. Is it still recommended to wait
five days for testing after seeing someone with COVID? Maybe you can remind,
when is the right time to test if we've been a contact.
MK That's
a great question. We don't actually make a recommendation on which day is best.
I think it depends on the system in country. If you are a contact of a case
there is national guidance that will come out that will give you a
recommendation.
00:15:40
You have to remember that there's the incubation
period from when you are exposed to when you may develop symptoms. People can
transmit this virus even before they develop symptoms and most transmission is
happening right around the time that people develop symptoms so that's like a
day zero.
If you think about the symptoms of COVID, it
could be anything from extremely mild - you could have a loss of taste, a loss
of smell - all the way through fever and really developing severe disease quite
quickly.
I think there're a variety of days that can be
tested. There's the PCR tests that are typically done in labs and clinics.
There are also antigen-based RDTs, rapid diagnostic tests that are now widely
available. Some people do those at home and that gives you an indication of
whether or not you are infected at the time that you take the test.
There is no golden set rule of when the best day
is but it is important that you do get tested if you are a contact of a
confirmed case and that you quarantine so that if you are infected the virus
stops with you and you don't pass it on to others.
00:16:46
AK Thank
you, Maria. Mike, here is a follow-up question for you coming from Thomas. He
says, since Dr Mike confirmed that you can contract the virus and transmit
COVID if you're vaccinated then wouldn't it be true that the variant would
become vaccine-resistant, hence why we constantly need boosters? The virus will
always outpace the creation of vaccine.
Maybe you can clarify, Mike, on this comment.
MR Yes,
I went into it last week a little as well. We don't see vaccines commonly
associated with the development of that, what we call vaccine escape, that the
viruses evolve to evade the... It can happen and we keep a very close eye out
for it but that's driven more by natural and random evolution of the virus, not
driven by the presence of the vaccine but just the way the virus evolves.
We're always watching to for any new variant
that emerges that might be, in a way, not resistant to the vaccine but where
the vaccine might become less effective and that's called immune escape where,
in a sense, the virus is able to evade the immune response that's been
generated due to having had a vaccine.
So we don't generally see that and the fact that
you become reinfected is... In general people are being reinfected by the same
strain they were infected with the first time so it's not that they've become -
people use this word - resistant to the vaccine.
It's that very often in some people, in a small
proportion of people the vaccine doesn't take properly and another proportion
of people might be immunocompromised, they don't get a full immune response.
In some people immunity might wane more quickly
than in others so there's a whole range of different factors that might
determine your risk to be reinfected and that's hard to predict in any given
individual.
So this idea of needing to be boosted all the
time - no, that's not the case. Also when we talk about very often waning
immunity and people measure antibodies, we're measuring this neutralising
antibody and this what they call sterilising antibodies and sometimes that
gives a false sense of immunity waning.
You see these antibody levels drop, drop, drop
and everyone says, oh, God, immunity is waning. That's not necessarily the case
because in effect what happens is the signal that says, I've got this much
antibody in my system, that wanes, the amount of antibody in your system wanes.
00:19:16
But the memory is still there. It's almost like
the way our memory works. Soon after an event you might forget all the details
but at some point in the future someone reminds you and all of a sudden all of
the details can flow back and that's essentially what happens.
The system doesn't carry around as much antibody
all the time but what it has deeply embedded in the system is the memory of
that infection and that's built into the system. Then the system can react very
quickly when the virus arrives and build up its immunity again.
So in other words there's a tremendous focus on
just measuring antibody levels, neutralising antibodies and they're very
important, and sterilising antibodies but it isn't the full story of immunity.
There's a much broader-based immune response that happens when you get
vaccinated and that immune response is sustained for a very long time in your
system.
00:20:13
And we don't know, we're really only a year and
in many cases six months into our experience of these vaccines and the studies
are being done constantly to see how the vaccines are still performing. I'm
encouraged with how well the vaccines are holding up in preventing severe
disease and preventing hospitalisation.
It's incredible to think that we have so many
vaccines that are still performing and doing that despite the emergence of
variants. So on the one hand we're lucky in that sense but we're always aware
that there could be a variant around the corner that could evade our vaccines
and that would be not a good thing.
But I don't believe that the vaccines themselves
are driving the evolution of the virus to escape the effectiveness of the
vaccines. It's a much more general process of viral evolution. That's different
if we end up with therapeutics and tablets that treat the virus because when
you're immune, when you have vaccine immunity you have no virus in your system and
then the virus arrives in small numbers and then your immune system can attack
it.
00:21:16
When you use a drug there's loads of virus in
the system because the person is very sick and now you introduce the drug into
the body and there are trillions of viruses and amongst those trillions of
viruses there may be one or two that have some resistance to the drug and
that's how resistance emerges.
The drug kills all the viruses that are
susceptible and the few that are left end up living and then they reproduce and
then the next generation of viruses is more resistant to the drug than before.
So it really is a matter of numbers. I know I'm
not explaining it very well but I am not as concerned about - resistance is the
wrong word but your listener had asked about that. I'd be much more concerned
about the emergence of resistance if we overuse antivirals or if we use
antivirals in an unintelligent way by just distributing them everywhere.
We'll have to be very careful when we get these
new antivirals in place. They could be game-changers and they can probably make
a huge difference in the long run but we're going to need to use them very
prudently so that we can maintain their benefit. But I'm not concerned about
vaccines right now.
00:22:35
MK Can
I say one thing on that last point? One of the things we're trying to ensure is
when we're doing testing and we're looking for cases we want to help people who
have COVID and give them the right treatment, they need to enter that clinical
care pathway wherever they live as soon as possible.
Earlier clinical care saves lives and what we've
been trying to talk about is, especially as new antivirals come online, it's
about the right patient getting that right test, getting the right treatment at
the right dose. It's not just that a new drug will become available and then
everybody can take a pill whenever.
We need to make sure that people are receiving
appropriate clinical care by trained medical professionals and that they're
using these therapeutics the right way because some therapeutics are focusing
on earlier in disease severity and others in late.
I think what Mike said is really, really
critical but it's the right patient, the right test, the right dose, the right
therapeutic and we're working with so many partners around the world.
00:23:30
We have an amazing clinical management team here
led by Dr Janet Diaz, working with clinicians around the world to get the data,
understand the clinical trials so that we can get that guidance out as quickly
as possible.
That's a huge amount of work but we're working
very hard to get more therapeutics assessed properly, robustly so that those
can be used but used appropriately, as Mike said.
AK Thank
you so much to both of you. Actually you covered a few more questions that others
were asking but I see that there are more questions coming in on vaccine
resistance so I would invite our viewers maybe to rewatch this as we have quite
a lot of questions coming in, so that we don't repeat.
But for those who just joined, we answered that
questions. Maria, here is a...
00:24:17
MR One
thing we could do is get Kate and Annamaria and others... This is obviously
something that is concerning people and it is not easy sometimes to... I find
it confusing at times. The vaccine prevents hospitalisation but it doesn't stop
infection?
These aren't intuitive things, these are not
directly intuitive so I don't blame anyone out there for feeling, hang on,
what's happening here? So I think it is important that we engage and find
better ways to explain this and engage with people.
So maybe we need a masterclass with Kate and
yourself and Annamaria to do a special Facebook Live around this specific
issue. I think it'd be worth it because this is something we really do need
people to get and to understand. We're not saying that vaccines don't work.
Vaccines work, they're saving hundreds of thousands, millions of lives around
the world.
It's just that in the specific area around
transmission they're not 100% effective in stopping that so therefore we still
need to keep taking basic precautions.
Then this whole issue of losing vaccine
efficacy. Everyone's concerned about that, I'm concerned about it. I've had
vaccine and I want to know it's going to work for as long as possible so maybe
it would be good, Aleks...
00:25:35
AK To
have a special session on it.
MR To
have a special session on that, as I say, maybe with Kate, Annamaria, yourself,
Maria, and others to go through that.
AK Thank
you, Mike. We'll make sure that we offer that masterclass as well to our
followers. Maria, there is a question now about the new variant that we are
reading about in the news so what do we know about this new variant and how
concerned are you about it?
MK Thanks.
I think what you're referring to is some of the recent media reports about this
E11529 so this is a variant that has been detected and reported to us from our
colleagues in South Africa.
There are ewer than 100 full-genome sequences
that are available. We don't know much about this yet. What we do know is that
this variant has a large number of mutations and the concern is that when you
have so many mutations it can have an impact on how the virus behaves.
00:26:35
So right now researchers are getting together to
understand where these mutations are and the spike protein and the furin
cleavage site and what that potentially may mean for our diagnostics, our
therapeutics and our vaccines.
What we need people to understand who are
watching this, who are reading those news articles is that these types of
variants being detected - it's good that they are being detected, it means that
we have a system in place.
I do want to thank our colleagues in South
Africa who are doing incredible genomic sequencing, doing incredible research
and they're planning to do, right now, neutralisation studies. It will take a
few weeks for us to understand what impact this variant has on any potential
vaccines for example but there's a lot of work that is underway.
Our technical advisory group on virus evolution
is discussing this with our colleagues in South Africa. We're also meeting
again tomorrow, we're calling a special meeting to discuss this, not to cause
alarm but just because we have the system in place. We can bring these
scientists together and discuss, what does it mean, and also set the timeline
for how long it will take for us to get those answers.
00:27:47
So right now it's a variant that is under
monitoring. The virus evolution working group or the TAGVE will discuss if it
will become a variant of interest or a variant of concern and if that's the
case then we will assign it a Greek name.
But it is something to watch and I think besides
the C11529 we need to understand, everybody that's out there needs to
understand that the more this virus circulates the more opportunities the virus
has to change, the more mutations we will see.
So given that so many people, a quarter of a
billion people have been reported to have been infected with this virus - and
we know that's a gross underestimate - if we look at seroprevalence studies around
the world, which capture unrecognised infections, past infection, that number
is far higher.
But the virus has a lot more room to go so we
need to drive that transmission down so that we reduce the possibility of
having more variants emerge. But this is one to watch. I would say we have
concern but I think you would want us to have concern and I want the viewers to
know that we have people who are on this, who are making sure that the right
people are having the discussions and as soon as we have more information to
share we will.
00:29:04
But don't forget, we still have the delta
variant which is also evolving and there are at least 30 sublineages of delta
that we are tracking. We have reported on the delta sublineage AY4.2, which has
been reported from the UK and in this sublineage there's a suggestion that this
variant has increased transmissibility, slightly over the delta variant.
So this virus has a lot of room to change. This
is why every single one of you watching has a role to play in driving transmission
down as well as protecting yourself against severe disease and death so get
vaccinated when you can, make sure you receive the full course of your doses
and make sure you take steps to reduce your exposure and prevent yourself from
passing that virus to someone else.
AK Thank
you, Maria. Mike, would you like to complement, please?
MR No,
I just would like to emphasise what Maria said regarding the work done in South
Africa. Work over the last two years in South Africa on surveillance, on
integrating genomics in this network for genomics surveillance in South Africa
and the way in which that's driven public health policy and work, it's truly
outstanding.
00:30:16
I know the Science and Innovation and Council in
South Africa, I think the Medical Research Council, the National Institute of
Communicable Diseases, a whole range of universities, Stellenbosch and others,
and others have been involved in this.
This is hugely responsible science. It's aimed
at providing insights and information that can drive public policy and being
able to pick up signals like this early and we saw that same in the United
Kingdom, two very good examples of countries that have build their public
health surveillance systems, expanded their genomic surveillance, made sure that
that genomic surveillance feeds back in to good decision-making at the
government level.
This is exemplary use of science for public
health good but I'd just also caution people. As these signals generate,
they're generated because these countries have in place these systems. There
could be all kinds of things happening in other countries where we don't know.
00:31:09
So it's really important that there are no
knee-jerk response here, especially in relation to South Africa. South Africa's
picking up interesting and important signals for which we're doing the proper
risk assessment and risk management.
Because we've seen in the past if there's any
mention of any kind of variation then everyone is closing borders and
restricting travel. It's really important that we remain open and we remain
focused on understanding and characterising the problem and not punishing
countries for doing outstanding scientific work and actually being open and
transparent about what they're seeing and what they're finding.
So I think it's really important at this point
that we have that approach, that countries like the UK, countries like South
Africa who do this work openly, share it openly and transparently, are
supported in doing that because that's what we need.
If we're going to beat this virus we need good
information and good information will only come when people feel that they may
share that information without being punished for having done so.
00:32:12
So I think this is a really good example where
we just need to be really, at this point, cautious and we need to be grateful
to our colleagues in South Africa for giving us this opportunity to understand
further virus evolution.
But we have not fully assessed any threat or
risk associated with this variation. That remains to be seen and the studies
need to be done so I'd just caution everyone to be... This happens, viruses
evolve and we pick up variations. It's not the end of the world, the sky is not
falling in because there is this idea that we're just waiting for the next variant
and I don't want people to spend their lives worrying about that every day.
Scientists need to worry about that and we need
to characterise those risks and you need to trust that we will tell you if
there's a significant change in risk and then to rely, as I said, on the superb
network of genomic surveillance in South Africa and the institutions that make
up that network.
MK They're
also helping the region so the researchers in South Africa are also helping to
improve sequencing across the continent and that's something that is also to be
commended.
00:33:15
We do need better sequencing around the world.
We need intelligent sequencing, not just more but intelligent and better
geographic coverage. If you look at some of the maps that we produce in our
sitrep you can see where for example delta has been reported in the last 60
days.
But I think that's more a reflection on where
those sequences have been shared rather than where delta is circulating. So
there are a lot of partners around the world that are helping to improve
sequencing, especially focusing on regional capacities, building regional and
national capacities and we need that to continue.
This is really an important moment in terms of
surveillance, there's a lot of attention to this and now is the time to build
those systems, support those systems so that they're good for SARS-CoV-2 and
helping to track and monitor this virus as it evolves but also for any future
infectious pathogens that will come our way.
AK Thank
you, Maria. I'm aware that we don't have too much time left but we have a good,
I think, three or four questions that we should really address today. The first
one is from Jonathan, watching us on LinkedIn. Is it time to join dots here? If
different countries are choosing different testing or public health measures
and vaccination regimes then we do not need to review the evidence and
encourage adoption of one system worldwide.
00:34:38
I think the question is, shall we actually
revisit the evidence and adopt one regime?
MR I
understand the instinct but my experience... I think we need one approach. We
need to look at the tools and actually understand the tools we're using so,
yes, we need one toolkit, one set of tools that we all recognise and understand
and support.
But then the tools we use will depend on the
situation in each country so that needs to be applied. You can't take an
approach here in Geneva and say, this is going to work everywhere every month
in every geographic situation and every social situation.
That's not true but we need to commonly
understand the value of mask-wearing and when it's useful, the value of
ventilation and when that's critical, the value of restrictive measures if
they're needed.
00:35:30
So we need to have the same understanding of the
public health value and impact of those things so that we then are
communicating in the same way to people. So I understand the question but I
think a global approach to vaccine equity has been badly needed and we need
more equity and we can do that at global level.
I think the research and development that has
been done has been done in a very co-ordinated way. We can have a common
understanding of what's happening in the world and we really do thank everyone
and all the people around the world, all the governments, all the institutions
that share with us every single day data on the pandemic.
We have, as you said, the weekly epi report and
other products that push that information back to all our partners around the
world, including the public. But no, I don't think you can say the solution
here is just to impose one...
For example some countries have populations that
are quite young and not too many people in the vulnerable age groups. Some
countries have many, many older population with many, many of the older population
in long-term care facilities. That's a time bomb in some countries if you don't
have high vaccination levels.
00:36:42
So the priorities also change and differ and, as
Maria said, we need to focus, I think, in terms of, rather than bringing in that
kind of draconian approach, what we need to fix in each country. I would say
you said it earlier. We need to find every single person who's unvaccinated,
particularly those individuals in older age groups with underlying conditions,
and try and convince those people to be vaccinated.
We should be doing that worldwide, no matter
what country we're in. We should be ensuring that all health workers are
vaccinated and that every health worker has access to proper protective
equipment. That should be a worldwide principle.
We need to have worldwide surveillance that
continues to look for genetic differences in the virus so genomic surveillance
everywhere and to share that technology everywhere so we have a common
understanding of what's happening in the world.
00:37:31
Yes, if it's a global regime, that kind of thing
but the idea that we can have one approach everywhere all the time, I don't
think so, Maria.
MK No,
I think you're exactly right and I think what we're trying to support countries
in doing is having a tailored response based on the situation in terms of the
epi in their population, the social contract that leaders have with their
communities as well as their capacities.
That needs to adjust because the virus is very
dynamic. Once the virus is circulating it doesn't mean that it's going to
circulate at that intensity all the time so the layers, as I was mentioning
before...
As you apply certain layers of response those
can be adjusted and lifted but that has to be done slowly and what we also
advise is it isn't just a... You need a national plan but it needs to be
implemented at the most local level possible.
So we know what tools work and we know vaccines
work against preventing severe disease and death. We know that masks work
against preventing onward transmission. We know that improving ventilation
helps prevent the spread in enclosed settings.
00:38:38
We know that physical distancing reduces the
opportunity for me, if I were infected, to infect you and so on and so on -
cleaning your hands. But we know when you add those in combination with each
other you're adding more and more protective layers.
So it really does depend on the circulation
around and then we tailor that approach as necessary.
AK Thank
you, Maria. We know that Dr Mike Ryan has another commitment.
MR I
have to run, if I can jump out, and I'll leave you with Maria and I can do it
without making too much noise. Is there any last question you'd like to ask me?
AK Maybe
just the last question is because it's related to the special session of the
World Health Assembly that we'll have. Jaya Kumar is asking, can you confirm,
what are the precautionary measures to be taken by every country for any future
pandemic through different sources of viruses, what are the most effective
preventive systems that can be made by countries well in advance to protect
people from any type of future pandemic?
00:39:34
MK Easy
question.
MR That's
a good question and I wish I had 14 hours to talk to you and not four seconds.
Maybe we need a special session on that. It's the right question and that's
what the member states are coming together for the first time... It's only the
second time in the history of WHO in 70 years that there's an extraordinary
World Health Assembly and all the nations of the world are going to get
together on Monday and they're going to talk about exactly that.
How do we put in place a framework to prepare
for and prevent the next pandemic? Number one, we can stop some of these things
breaching the species barrier so some of the management of risk we have to do
is in the animal side, in the environment.
In fact our best protection may not be on the
human side. Our best protection may be on the other side of that barrier in
terms of managing our planet better, managing our biome better, identifying
risks in nature so they don't cross over the barriers, protecting those
barriers so that we don't create holes in that natural barrier by what we do in
terms of trade and everything else.
00:40:41
We can do a lot more to increase our ability to
detect early and contain these diseases early, to share information, biologic
samples. We can do a lot more to accelerate research, development and
innovation and share the results of that more equitably.
So in each and every one of those phases we can
make our health systems much more ready and resilient and fast and flexible.
All of that can be achieved but it can't be achieved unless the member states
and organisations around the world come together and define, how are we going
to do that, what's the plan, how are we going to govern that, how are we going
to finance that and what are these priority systems we need to develop.
00:41:20
We need a roadmap, we need a game plan and we
need a new game plan and we need it quickly because the next pandemic may not
be that far down the line and that's what that meeting is about next week.
My quote of the day and I've used it a couple of
times today because I think it's so profound. Abraham Lincoln once said - a
great leader historically in the world - if you want to predict the future you
must create it. So the best way to predict the future is to create it. I think
that's exactly what he said, the best way to predict the future is to create
it.
So if we want control of the future, we want
control of our health, control of the risks that we face then we need to create
a future in which those risks are reduced and we have control over viruses and
not them over us.
That's not just going to take a week or a month.
It's going to take a decade, it's going to take a generation to do that, no
more than with climate but there are things we need to do now, like with
climate change, and there are things we need to do over five years and over ten
and over 20.
My fear is if we don't take the first steps, if
we say, ah, well, we'll come back to this next year or the year after, then
we'll have forgotten.
00:42:30
So next week is really important. This is really
the biggest chance that our member states, 194 states from all over the world,
are going to come together and discuss one topic only, this topic. So citizens
out there, time to tell your leaders what you want from this meeting next week
because it's an important one.
AK Thank
you, Mike. This was a great way for you to end this conversation and we're also
inviting everyone to watch the discussion. It will be live-streamed on our
website, Monday to Wednesday if you want to see what the health leaders of the
world will be discussing and what will be their agreement for the way forward.
But I think, Maria, you had something to add as
well.
MK Just
very briefly to say that we really do have an opportunity right now, as Mike
was saying and I think you've heard us talk quite a lot before about... The
world is going through something incredibly traumatic right now and incredibly
painful and difficult and now is the time to make those changes.
00:43:25
Now is the time while that trauma is fresh - and
of course we hope that this ends as soon as possible - now is the time to make
those changes because if we don't make those changes now we will move on to the
next crisis and there are plenty of other crises that are out there.
But for COVID-19 this is a global problem and we
need global solutions but there are solutions and I think people worry and I
understand the worry but I think they should also be hopeful because we have
those tools.
We have vaccines as part of our toolkit but they
have to reach everybody who needs them, particularly those who are most at
risk. We have masks that are widely available now that prevent the onward spread.
People have access to good hand hygiene, they can clean their hands, which does
help for COVID-19 but also other infectious pathogens that are out there.
We know that distancing works, we know that we
can get kids back to school by making sure that the right provisions are in
place, that we can support people to work from home. We know that surveillance
and testing and good clinical care...
These are tools that are part of our toolkit but
we need to strengthen them now. We can't wait for this to be over and then say,
okay, what should we do? I don't want to hear any more lessons learned, we have
books and reports of lessons learned and we're grateful for those, don't get me
wrong.
00:44:44
But now let's make those changes and let's make
those course corrections now. So next week is a huge opportunity for health
leaders to come together, led by Dr Tedros and brilliant people like Mike -
thank God for him.
But we really, really do need to make these
changes because if we don't do it now, when will we?
AK Thank
you, Maria. I'm glad you brought back the precautionary measures because we got
a few questions on that and I couldn't finish this conversation until we
clarify. Marc Tressiser, who is watching us on Facebook, is asking, is it safe
for fully vaccinated people to gather without wearing masks or social
distancing?
MK It
depends on where you live. As vaccination increases it does reduce the
opportunity to get infected and pass the virus on but we still recommend even
if you are vaccinated to wear a mask when you're indoors and when you're with
other people.
00:45:37
If you are indoors with other people make sure
you have good ventilation, good cross-flow, open those windows, try to
physically distance as well. I know that becomes very hard and it's Thanksgiving
in America so I do want to say happy Thanksgiving to my family and to my
friends who are celebrating. We really wish we could be with you but one day we
will celebrate again Thanksgiving.
But yes, there are precautions that need to be
put in place. Vaccines alone are not enough so what we recommend is vaccines
and, not vaccines only so please continue to just be cautious and take measures
to keep you...
It's not just about you so even if you are
vaccinated you may be with other people who aren't and if that person is in a
vulnerable category they do have a higher risk of dying if they were to be
infected.
So get vaccinated for you, wear your mask for
you but also for others.
AK Thank
you, Maria. I will just join in saying happy Thanksgiving to you, your family
but also to everyone celebrating today and I hope you are taking the
precautionary measures to celebrate safely.
00:46:48
There was another question as well from someone
else asking about mass gatherings and whether we still, despite vaccination,
should be, if we go to a sports match or other mass gathering, be all wearing
masks to reduce the risk as obviously people are crowded in such settings.
MK Yes,
we advise when there are gatherings taking place to do a risk assessment. Where
is the event, how many people will be there, what precautions are in place in
terms of distancing, is it indoors or outdoors, will there be a test
requirement, are you requiring vaccination, will people need masks?
Again the comment is really about the fact that
vaccines don't prevent all infections and don't prevent all transmissions so
that's why we continue to advise even if you are vaccinated to continue to wear
your mask when you're with others.
This is for now, this is not forever. It won't
be like this forever, I promise it won't be like this forever but we need to
get through this together and putting that mask on, keeping that distance,
avoiding those crowds where you can will help get us towards the end of this
pandemic.
00:47:57
Unfortunately we have quite a ways to go with
the current situation that we are in and so we need everyone to play their
part.
AK Thank
you, Maria. Some were asking why we here in this room are not wearing masks so
we are in a quite well-ventilated room. We are also keeping the distance so
this is not a crowded environment and yes, we are fully vaccinated but that's
not the only reason. It's other precautionary measures that we are putting in
place.
Maybe a last note to end on today - this is why
I'm wearing orange. It's International Day of Elimination of Violence Against
Women. One in three women around the world experience violence, domestic
violence and we've seen many reports that during the pandemic there were even
more experiences faced.
Maria, maybe as a last message today, how can we
all be part of the solution to support survivors and also to help end violence?
MK I
think you even answered it as you asked the question. I think we all have to
stand up to end violence. The statistic that you read that one in three women
globally experience violence, that has increased during this pandemic with
women having to stay at home, with the stay-at-home measures that are in place
not only for women but for partners and also children.
00:49:18
So it's been quite a dangerous time for many and
we cannot lose sight of that. There are support systems that are in place if
women can reach out there are systems. We need more systems within countries to
support women in this and we have to stand up against violence against women no
matter where we live on this planet.
We need to support those systems in place that
help those women get out of those situations and stand in solidarity. I didn't
wear orange today. I don't own anything orange. I'll have to buy myself
something orange.
AK There
are 16 days of activism to orange the world, to express solidarity with victims
but also to call for action to end violence so you still have time.
MK I
have time.
00:50:06
AK I
thank all our viewers from Rwanda, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Switzerland, Serbia -
my country - Spain, Cuba, Peru, Slovakia, Costa Rica, Argentina, Turkey, New
Zealand, Belgium and many other countries for watching us today, for all great
questions.
We apologise for not taking them all but we do
our best to provide you with answers or to organise more special sessions, as
Mike suggested, to go maybe into a deep dive on a particular subject.
Follow our channels next week in particular for
the special session of the World Health Assembly and also for any updates on
new variants or any other health issues. Thank you and goodbye.
00:50:53