Global Programme on Tuberculosis & Lung Health
The WHO Global Programme on Tuberculosis & Lung Health works towards the goal of a world free of TB, with zero deaths, disease and suffering due to the disease. The team’s mission is to lead and guide the global effort to end the TB epidemic through universal access to people-centred prevention and care, multisectoral action and innovation.

TB economic evaluation & survey

The TB economics and finance team in collaboration with partners across countries, academia and across WHO supports WHO’s member states to collect, evaluate and introduce economic evidence into TB prevention, diagnosis and care policy. This work is accomplished by disseminating methods, standards and tools as well as capitalizing and expanding country capacity, and by providing technical assistance to countries to produce and use economic evidence to advance in the End TB strategy and UHC agenda.

Three main areas in TB economic evaluation & survey:

  1. Measuring costs borne by TB-affected households
  2. Measuring costs of delivering TB services at the facility
  3. TB economic modelling

Guidance and tools links in this page are intended for use by Ministries of Health and/or research partners wishing to conduct economic evaluation to support public policy and strategy.

TB patient cost surveys

The World Health Organization (WHO) End TB Strategy includes the target that no tuberculosis (TB) patients or their households face catastrophic costs (including direct medical expenditures, non-medical expenditures and income losses) because of TB disease.

Monitoring of progress towards this target can inform monitoring of progress towards universal health coverage (UHC); however, this target should not be confused or directly compared with the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) UHC indicator for financial protection from health care expenditures among the general. Our team at WHO provides global monitoring of the End TB indicator and periodically synthesizes results and lessons learned.

WHO has established standard methods for conducting a national survey to assess the direct and indirect costs incurred by people with TB and their households (TB patient cost surveys) as well as to assess the proportion of households incurring catastrophic costs (defined as total costs equivalent to 20% or more of annual household income or expenditure).

Guidance, data collection and analysis tools can also be adapted in the context of other economic evaluation research where costs of TB interventions are assessed from several perspectives (provider, patient, community, societal) including the patient perspective.

Measuring costs of delivering TB services at the facility

The best way to measure the cost of delivering TB services in a country is through costing studies based on recommended methods, including primary data collection at national and local levels.

The Costing guidelines for tuberculosis interventions and associated Value TB costing tool suite (which forms part of the costing guidelines) provide TB planners and operational research partners with standards and tools to measure the costs of delivering TB services at the facility level (i.e. unit cost of TB services).

The guidelines provide practical advice on how to collect cost data, perform analysis, use and disseminate data. The tools can be used to estimate the costs of delivering TB services nationally based on a nationally representative sample of facilities. They can also be used and adapted to estimate the costs of introducing new and emerging TB technologies to inform resource allocation between different TB interventions.

 

TB economic modelling

Our team contributes to the development of guidelines and tools to support the use of standard and best-practice methods for cost and cost-effectiveness studies related to tuberculosis. Economic and impact modelling for tuberculosis interventions (e.g. cost-effectiveness analysis, investment case, budget impact analysis) using global standards, contributes to the expansion of the knowledge-base of TB interventions that are cost-effective, and provides evidence to support the path towards Universal Health Coverage.

Modelling cost, burden and economic impact of TB interventions

This includes collaborating on global or regional price tag work (e.g. the Global Plan to End TB). We collaborate on this work with partners such as TBMAC and WHO CHOICE team. We are planning to support the uptake of the EPIC model (a model to estimate the burden of ill-health on economic performance) to estimate the burden of TB on economic performance of countries.

Annual actualization of WHO CHOICE econometric model to generate estimates of unit cost values for primary and secondary health care services in 215 countries is generated by our team for use in estimates of the cost of general health services for patients with TB or MDR TB now featured in TB finance country profiles.

 

Feature story