WHO Evaluation Office

WHO Evaluation Office

WHO / Ala Kheir
In Gedaref, Sudan, WHO staff monitor water quality at a school sheltering families displaced by conflict.
© Credits


The evaluation function empowers WHO’s culture of accountability, learning and decision-making to promote, provide and protect health and well-being for all people, everywhere. 

Role of WHO Evaluation: Evaluation strengthens accountability, promotes learning, and enhances organizational performance. Through impartial, high-quality assessments, the WHO Evaluation Office supports evidence-based decision-making and planning, helping ensure that WHO’s policies, systems, and interventions deliver better health outcomes for all. Evaluation is also a cornerstone of WHO’s results-based management approach. The Evaluation Office is located within the Office of Internal Oversight Services and supports the Organization’s overall evaluation function.

Independence and quality assurance: As a functionally independent entity, the Evaluation Office is dedicated to guaranteeing that evaluation processes are inclusive, impartial, and conducted with scientific rigour. Widely disseminating evaluation findings and recommendations is a key priority, with a strong emphasis on fostering opportunities for collective learning and supporting the implementation of recommendations to improve organizational effectiveness and outcomes.

Collaboration and system-wide learning: WHO Evaluation works with UN entities, global networks, and partners to enhance the quality, credibility, and impact of its evaluations. Through active engagement in UNEG and collaboration on joint and system-wide evaluations, it contributes to coherence and shared learning across the UN system.

 

Evaluations

Corporate evaluations are organization-wide exercises commissioned by the WHO Evaluation Office to assess strategic, thematic, programmatic, joint, or humanitarian and emergency-related issues that cut across departments, regions or functions.


Decentralized evaluations are commissioned and managed by WHO programmes, departments, offices or hosted partnerships outside the headquarter Evaluation Office. They may take the form of thematic or programmatic evaluations, as well as office-specific evaluations conducted at regional, country or headquarters departmental levels.


Country programme evaluations assess WHO’s overall contribution to health outcomes in a specific country. They take a comprehensive look at how WHO’s support across all three levels of the Organization aligns with national health priorities, WHO’s General Programme of Work, country cooperation strategies and broader development goals.


Publications

All →

The evaluation was commissioned by WHO to assess its contribution to Bhutan’s health sector during 2020–2024 in line with the WHO Country Cooperation...

The evaluation was commissioned by WHO to assess its contribution to Bhutan’s health sector during 2020–2024 in line with the WHO Country Cooperation...

Evaluation of WHO contribution in Jordan: Executive summary

The independent evaluation of WHO contribution in Jordan focuses on the results achieved at the country level using the inputs from all three levels of...

Evaluation policy (2025)

The Evaluation Policy, as approved by the Executive Board in 2025, defines the overall framework for evaluation at WHO, fosters the culture and use of...

Documents

All →

The evaluation was commissioned by WHO to assess its contribution to Bhutan’s health sector during 2020–2024 in line with the WHO Country Cooperation...

The independent evaluation of WHO contribution in Jordan focuses on the results achieved at the country level using the inputs from all three levels of...

The independent evaluation of WHO contribution in Jordan focuses on the results achieved at the country level using the inputs from all three levels of...

This guidance helps ensure WHO evaluation reports are clear, credible, and consistent.It outlines standards for formatting, structure, referencing, and...